[brailleblaster] Re: Thoughts on the Specification

  • From: Michael Whapples <mwhapples@xxxxxxx>
  • To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:59:06 +0000

Hello,
I don't think having the Braille and daisy views as top level windows with there own menus would be very natural. Firstly it doesn't really fit with any other GUI application I can think of, normally they either modify available menu options depending on the current view or they grey out unavailable options. So as greyed out options are fairly "normal" to encounter I don't see why they would be confusing. Then there is the case of platforms where menus aren't actually in the window but get placed by applications in a system menu bar like in Mac OSX (NOTE: SWT will automatically handle this for you). As an example of the Mac situation, in safari the web browser, even when I go to its preferences all menu options are still there but ones which are irrelevant to preferences (eg. the option to show/hide the status bar) are greyed out.

Also the idea of two top level windows being present in one application at the same time just seems odd to me, I couldn't imagine it would look right (it would probably look like two separate applications). Then what happens when there are more documents opened, your description seems to give me more top level windows and more clutter of the desktop. Then there is the situation of "I am working on a document in BrailleBlaster, I have finished on that document so I close the document but keeping BrailleBlaster open as I want to work on another document", what do I encounter at the point when BrailleBlaster has no open documents? Having the document views as child elements of a "BrailleBlaster appliccation top level window" I would be left with an empty BrailleBlaster window containing only the menus and toolbars (IE. no sub windows), allowing me to go to the menu and choose open document or new or whatever task I want to do. Also with my idea of the view, multiple documents would just lead to more sub views, the desktop only ever has one BrailleBlaster top level window.

Now one thing which might be desired is a shortcut pop-up menu specific to each view. What I mean is one of those context menus which are activated by right clicking the mouse of a UI element (use the applications key or may be shift+f10 and on Mac with voiceover vo+shift+m). In these context menus only the options relevant to that element would be shown.

Michael Whapples
On 09/12/10 04:55, John J. Boyer wrote:
This sounds good. My understanding was that the Daisy and Braille
windows would each have their own menus. The specification doesn't say
so explicitly, but it seemed reasonable, since some things would be
possible in one window and some things in another. If the Daisy and
Braille windows are embedded in a top window with the menus, status bar
and toolbar, the grayed-out options could be confusing and frustrating
for the user. Is this actually the way it will be?

So the print and embosser previews are basically big dialog boxes. I
don't remember anyone saying they should be open continually. They are
opened when needed.

I don't think BrailleBlsster should display multiple documents
simultaneously, since it already has two views for each document.
Rather, when a user switched to another document these view would be
changed for that document.

The Daisy and Braille windows should prbably be called views instead,
especially if they don't contain their own menus.

John

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0000, Michael Whapples wrote:
We seem to be getting a whole jumble of things here. A window is a very
generic thing. A dialog is a type of window, normally used to show
messages or let users select options. A dialog is not embedded in the
top level window but can be such that it prevents the user going back to
the main window. A dialog might not cover the main application top level
window. Then there are child windows (they may have another name) which
usually is embedded into the top level window. These may be used for
multiple documents (eg. MS Word has been known to work like this I don't
know about their latest version). Finally then there are what I am
calling a top level window, these don't have any other window containing
them.

My feeling is:
* BrailleBlaster will have a top level window containing the menus and
such like which are common to all situations.
* The daisy viewer and Braille viewers will be child windows or may be
even panes within a child window or may be this will all work on the tab
idea. Anyway the main idea is these will be embedded into the top level
window.
* Print and preview will be dialog boxes as these are both actions (IE.
I go to print/emboss a document or I go and view how it will be
printed). I see no reason why print preview would need to be open
continually.

Michael Whapples
On 08/12/10 20:13, John J. Boyer wrote:
I've never actually looked at a print preview window. Has anyone seen an
embosser preview window? I would think that programs would handle
preview by opening a temporary window that either hides the existing
window or minimizes them.

John

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:27:33PM -0600, qubit wrote:
Regarding What happens to the windows when a print preview is active:
I wonder if opening a new window is a good idea.
I am growing to like one feature in eclipse's UI: eclipse will cycle
through
all the various windows if you hold control and type F7 repeatedly.
It has a lot of rather busy windows.  I wonder what it looks like to a
sighted person.

As for print preview, I have no idea what to do if you are embossing a
document.  The image in the braille window doesn't necessarily look like
the
output of the device.  Do the various embossers provide any kind of API
for
knowing what the braille will look like?
Also, if viewing it on screen, you are further limited by the display
capabilities.

Interesting question.  But do you really want there to be a hard coded
window for print preview, print  and emboss?  Couldn't it just be like
most
apps that put a command for print and emboss and print preview in the file
menu? That could bring up a dialog.
Just wondering.
--le

----- Original Message -----
From: "John J. Boyer"<john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:<brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 9:24 AM
Subject: [brailleblaster] Thoughts on the Specification


I have just reread the specification carefully. It certainly hangs
together better for me than at the beginning. Here are some thoughts.
There is a menu item for opening a list of recent documents. These
documents should be on the menu, just below the exit choice, as they are
ikn most word processors.

The ability to open recent documents means that the users will want MDI.
Fortunately, this is not hard to implement.

We may need a third window for each document for print and embosser
previews. What happens to the Daisy and Braille windows when a preview
is chosen? Are they minimized?

John

--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities




Other related posts: