[bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:

  • From: "Lynnette" <superlynne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:05:14 -0400

<chuckle>
Lynnette
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:


> The Bookport functions as it was intended.  A TV without a screen
> doesn't because expected functionality is missing.  If some one were
> generous enough
> To purchase a Bookport for me as a gift, I don't imagine that the first
> thing I would do is to go to that person and say, "But where's the
> speaker on this piece of junk?"
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Poehlman
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:28 AM
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:
> 
> 
> Ok, the price on the site is rong then?  iut was listed as 49x or  
> something like that.  I could go and check but you know better than  
> I.  Again I say, this is acustomer request so just take it for what  
> it is worth from someone who's been around blindness products for a  
> long time.  Yes, people who get them if they buy them know what they  
> are getting in advance, but many are given as gifts to people who  
> have never heard of them and they should be correctly built.  I will  
> not buy one because it does not have a speaker and it does not allow  
> me to store stuff in it and unless the stereo bug is fixed.  I also  
> do not like the speech or the spacing of the buttons.
> 
> Let this be what it is, not an attack or intended critisism but would  
> have been customer observations.  Yes, you can adapt but the price  
> means you should not have to.  Suppose I got a tv for 7 hundred  
> dollars and was told it dien't come with a screen?
> 
> -- 
> Jonnie Apple Seed
> With his:
> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> 
> 
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Walt Smith wrote:
> 
> Not if it would alter the unit's size. This subject has been debated to
> death and beyond on this list and there's no solid consensus, but as  
> far as
> I'm concerned, anything that would tend to increase the unit's size or
> weight is completely unacceptable. People who purchase it know in  
> advance
> what they're getting and not getting and if you can find a Walkman  
> that does
> one per cent of what the Book Port does, you're welcome to it.  
> Besides, you
> should at least get the price right--it's $400, not $500.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 9:00 AM
> Subject: [bookport] bookport needs a speaker:
> 
> 
> When I examined a book port for several weeks beginning around
> memorial day, I was most put off by the fact that I had to augment
> the unit with something else before even beginning to use it.  Yes,
> it's lovely, but no walk man that I know of costs 500 dollars.  I
> know that the IPod and its kin require augmentation too, but we are
> talking about a classic need here and that is one of being able to
> hear the audio and for 500 dollars, you'd think we'd get something
> with a speaker in it.
> 
> Further on the discussion of what should be in the book port, I was
> disapointed that I could not just load something into the book port
> without yet another augmentation which granted like headphones was
> supplied but unnerving nonetheless especially if you need better
> headphones or an external speaker or a bigger card.  I was fully
> informed and it was no surprise but the reality was a bit different
> from the knowing in advance.  Were a speaker emplanted into the bp we
> could have error tones and other tonal indications augmenting our
> experience.
> 
> I'd love to hear the wisdom behind the current design other than
> perhaps better bat life and a more compact design?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Jonnie Apple Seed
> With his:
> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Other related posts: