[bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:

  • From: "Walt Smith" <ka3agm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:30:42 -0400

It's also a customer request to not add a speaker and that's a standoff.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:20 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:


It could be small and still sound good.  IIt could be on the back of  
the unit.  It might make the unit a bit larger depending on design,  
but it would be hugely worth it and this is no opinion.  It may well  
be a bad idea, but it is a customer request.

-- 
Jonnie Apple Seed
With his:
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s


On Sep 5, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Chris Hill wrote:

If the unit had a speaker, it'd be too small and you'd complain about
how it sounded.  It'd also make the unit larger, and I'd complain
about that.  The speaker idea is a bad one.


On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:00:39 -0400, you wrote:


> When I examined a book port for several weeks beginning around
> memorial day, I was most put off by the fact that I had to augment
> the unit with something else before even beginning to use it.  Yes,
> it's lovely, but no walk man that I know of costs 500 dollars.  I
> know that the IPod and its kin require augmentation too, but we are
> talking about a classic need here and that is one of being able to
> hear the audio and for 500 dollars, you'd think we'd get something
> with a speaker in it.
>
> Further on the discussion of what should be in the book port, I was
> disapointed that I could not just load something into the book port
> without yet another augmentation which granted like headphones was
> supplied but unnerving nonetheless especially if you need better
> headphones or an external speaker or a bigger card.  I was fully
> informed and it was no surprise but the reality was a bit different
> from the knowing in advance.  Were a speaker emplanted into the bp we
> could have error tones and other tonal indications augmenting our
> experience.
>
> I'd love to hear the wisdom behind the current design other than
> perhaps better bat life and a more compact design?
>
> Thanks!
>







Other related posts: