There is another way to solve this issue. You can buy an amplified speaker. They are not expensive. -- Barbara Jones -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Poehlman Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:21 AM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker: It could be small and still sound good. IIt could be on the back of the unit. It might make the unit a bit larger depending on design, but it would be hugely worth it and this is no opinion. It may well be a bad idea, but it is a customer request. -- Jonnie Apple Seed With his: Hands-On Technolog(eye)s On Sep 5, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Chris Hill wrote: If the unit had a speaker, it'd be too small and you'd complain about how it sounded. It'd also make the unit larger, and I'd complain about that. The speaker idea is a bad one. On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:00:39 -0400, you wrote: > When I examined a book port for several weeks beginning around > memorial day, I was most put off by the fact that I had to augment the > unit with something else before even beginning to use it. Yes, it's > lovely, but no walk man that I know of costs 500 dollars. I know that > the IPod and its kin require augmentation too, but we are talking > about a classic need here and that is one of being able to hear the > audio and for 500 dollars, you'd think we'd get something with a > speaker in it. > > Further on the discussion of what should be in the book port, I was > disapointed that I could not just load something into the book port > without yet another augmentation which granted like headphones was > supplied but unnerving nonetheless especially if you need better > headphones or an external speaker or a bigger card. I was fully > informed and it was no surprise but the reality was a bit different > from the knowing in advance. Were a speaker emplanted into the bp we > could have error tones and other tonal indications augmenting our > experience. > > I'd love to hear the wisdom behind the current design other than > perhaps better bat life and a more compact design? > > Thanks! >