[bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:

  • From: "Barbara Jones" <b.j.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:21:33 -0400

There is another way to solve this issue. You can buy an amplified speaker.
They are not expensive.

--
Barbara Jones
 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Poehlman
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:21 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport needs a speaker:


It could be small and still sound good.  IIt could be on the back of  
the unit.  It might make the unit a bit larger depending on design,  
but it would be hugely worth it and this is no opinion.  It may well  
be a bad idea, but it is a customer request.

-- 
Jonnie Apple Seed
With his:
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s


On Sep 5, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Chris Hill wrote:

If the unit had a speaker, it'd be too small and you'd complain about how it
sounded.  It'd also make the unit larger, and I'd complain about that.  The
speaker idea is a bad one.


On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:00:39 -0400, you wrote:


> When I examined a book port for several weeks beginning around 
> memorial day, I was most put off by the fact that I had to augment the 
> unit with something else before even beginning to use it.  Yes, it's 
> lovely, but no walk man that I know of costs 500 dollars.  I know that 
> the IPod and its kin require augmentation too, but we are talking 
> about a classic need here and that is one of being able to hear the 
> audio and for 500 dollars, you'd think we'd get something with a 
> speaker in it.
>
> Further on the discussion of what should be in the book port, I was 
> disapointed that I could not just load something into the book port 
> without yet another augmentation which granted like headphones was 
> supplied but unnerving nonetheless especially if you need better 
> headphones or an external speaker or a bigger card.  I was fully 
> informed and it was no surprise but the reality was a bit different 
> from the knowing in advance.  Were a speaker emplanted into the bp we 
> could have error tones and other tonal indications augmenting our 
> experience.
>
> I'd love to hear the wisdom behind the current design other than 
> perhaps better bat life and a more compact design?
>
> Thanks!
>









Other related posts: