[bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: Sandy Licht <slicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:33:05 -0600
Mine would probably be fine if I took the time to format.
At 12:43 PM 1/2/2007, Walt Smith wrote:
And my 2Gb card isn't at all sluggish, but this will _always_ depend on the
number of entries in the root. I try to keep the number of first-level files
and folders as small as I can.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Licht" <slicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 12:27 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
Looks like the APH staff is going to have to revisit this one then.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/1/2007
Sandy Licht
Jeremiah 29:11 - 14 A .
11 For I know the plans I have for you," says the Lord. "They are
plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope.
12 In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13 If you look for me
in earnest, you will find me when you seek me. 14 I will be found by
you," says the Lord.
- References:
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: David Allen
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: Sandy Licht
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: Walt Smith
Other related posts:
- » [bookport] Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- » [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
And my 2Gb card isn't at all sluggish, but this will _always_ depend on the number of entries in the root. I try to keep the number of first-level files and folders as small as I can. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandy Licht" <slicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 12:27 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity Looks like the APH staff is going to have to revisit this one then. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/1/2007
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: David Allen
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: Sandy Licht
- [bookport] Re: Bookport capacity
- From: Walt Smith