[bksvol-discuss] Re: questions please and thank you delete if don't like how I write.
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Ah, I'm too late. I'd take Plain Perfect or The Forbidden, but the former is on
hold for Gail and the latter is already being proofed. The others are too--I
can't think of the proper word--evangelistic?, for me? Gail, if you want to
take one of the more overtly religious/ one I'll do Plain Perfect, unless
you're already into it?
Wish List (i.e., books wanted added to the collection) and books-being-scanned
list available at sites below
Wish List: https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Bookshare+Wish+List
Books Being Scanned List:
https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/Books+Being+Scanned+List
--- On Tue, 11/17/09, gwen tweedy <gstweedy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: gwen tweedy <gstweedy@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: questions please and thank you delete if don't
> like how I write.
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 10:08 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I believe the ones left
> are these:
> Plain Perfect
> The
> Longing
> The Forbidden
> That Wilder
> boy
> Relationship Principles of
> Jesus
> and I think that is
> it.
> Thanks to all and
> considering the mess I made and
> had beforehey it's better LOL :)
> gotta smile about it or
> I'd cry.
> Can't think to hard of
> stuff like this, you go
> round and round thinking what did I do wrong, that is why
> in some senses one
> would wish they could sneak up and see what y'all are
> seeing and say hey I
> didn't mean that to still be in there ETC. That
> kind of thing, that way
> when y'all got it they'd be so easy
> Y'all would just love
> to hear from me book wise
> not like now *smile*
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> -----
> From:
> Lori
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday,
> November 17, 2009 11:17
> AM
> Subject:
> [bksvol-discuss] Re: questions
> please and thank you delete if don't like how I
> write.
>
>
> What books do you still
> have up. I know a few of
> them have been proofed and accepted and several people
> had volunteered to take
> your books on as they got time--me being one of them. If
> you have a revised
> list, please share.
>
> Lori
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> -----
> From:
> gwen tweedy
>
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday,
> November 17, 2009 11:20
> AM
> Subject:
> [bksvol-discuss] Re: questions
> please and thank you delete if don't like how I
> write.
>
>
> That makes sense
> on the first question
> Thanks.
> I guess I just wish
> there were a way when you
> goof up and you know your scans most likely won't
> make it if there would be
> a way you could reject them yourself, clear your
> books so you could
> have a clean slate.
> Thanks
> Gwen
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> -----
> From:
> EVAN
> REESE
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday,
> November 17, 2009
> 10:13 AM
> Subject:
> [bksvol-discuss] Re:
> questions please and thank you delete if don't
> like how I write.
>
>
> Hi
> Gwen,
>
> As to the first
> question, it used to be that
> scanners could proofread, (validate), as it used to
> be called), their own
> works. However, that was changed because having a
> different proofreader
> can find mistakes that the original scanner missed.
> Seeing with fresh
> eyes, in a manner of speaking. I know that I have
> made mistakes in books I
> submitted that were caught by the proofreader,
> so I think this is a
> good system.
>
> Not sure I
> understand your second question,
> though.
>
> Evan
>
>
> ----- Original
> Message -----
> From:
> gwen tweedy
>
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday,
> November 17, 2009
> 9:46 AM
> Subject:
> [bksvol-discuss] questions
> please and thank you delete if don't like how I
> write.
>
>
> I'm wondering
> if there are people who have
> no trouble submitting books their books are always
> excepted no matter
> what.
> Why
> couldn't they be allowed to scan
> and proof their own books if they so
> desired?
> Question
> 2:
> Why can't a
> scanner at least be allowed to
> clear their book lists so they can start over
> with no books
> pending?
> Thanks
> Gwen
>
>
> __________ Information
> from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 4614
> (20091117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32
> Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
