[bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: "Sarah Van Oosterwijck" <curiousentity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:05:17 -0600
Just remember that you can copy stuff from the book itself
, but you must reword book discriptions you obtain from other sources in
order not to violate any copyright laws.
Sarah Van Oosterwijck
http://home.earthlink.net/~netentity
----- Original Message -----
From: <vining@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
> I must add my grumpiness to E.'s on this subject. It is so aggravating
not
> to have even a brief synopsis. For heaven's sake, how long does it
take to
> visit Powells or Amazon or do a simple Google search to find one?
>
> And perhaps worse in my opinion is to see "mystery by bestselling
author."
> in the synopsis field! That tells us nothing about the book. Maddening
> stuff!
>
> Joanie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 1:32 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
>
>
> > Again we have books on the new books list with no synopsis. I
assume this
> > must mean the person who scanned it and the validator have no idea
what
> the
> > book is about. Yes I am being sarcastic. Also A Private Affair has
a
> > synopsis with a lot of errors in it.
> >
> > Is there some simple way we can add descriptions to books if we are
not
> the
> > submitter or validator? It would make the list nicer. Also, I run
into a
> > lot of descriptions with spelling errors or other messiness. How
can we
> > fix that?
> >
> > Forgive me if my message sounds grumpy.
> > E.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: Pam Quinn
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: Mary Otten
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: vining
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: Pam Quinn
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: Mary Otten
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: OT: Re: To Carrie
- From: vining