[bksvol-discuss] Re: I have a question please and thank you.

  • From: Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:49:19 EDT

Some time ago I recall Pavi saying that the dictionary that algorithm uses 
was reviewed and that it was laughable when they saw some of the words that 
were in it. Supposedly that was corrected, but I very much suspect that I 
would still consider it laughable. Honestly, I was once telling someone 
something another person said. I mentioned that the person had said that 
another 
person was pissed off. I do not ordinarily use that phrase myself, but since 
I was relating what someone else said I did that time. I was angrily accused 
of being obscene. It never even occurred to me in my wildest speculations 
that anyone would consider that to be obscene and if I had found it in that 
dictionary of prohibited words and phrases I would have found that laughable. 
Nevertheless, someone did consider it obscene. That is why I tend to think 
that the person who is offended by so-called "adult" words has the problem, 
not the one who utters them.

                                                                          
"The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies 
the end. 
" Leon Trotsky     

                 The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder Press: 
http://www.pathfinderpress.com
Granma International: http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html
                 _

table with 2 columns and 6 rows
Subj: 
[bksvol-discuss] Re: I have a question please and thank you.   
Date: 
9/8/2009 10:48:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time  
From: 
cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Reply-to: 
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
To: 
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Sent from the Internet 
(Details) 
table end

Evan, I've wondered about how that algorithm works too, because 
of the children's books I've proofed that were erroneously marked 
as adult by the algorithm.  I'd bet part of it is based on 
Bookshare useing a dictionary of words that can be considered 
adult (with some contexting built in, I'd guess).  The final 
designation of adult comes about by using a weighting of the 
number of times words/terms/phrases appear factored against the 
total number of words in a book.  So if you have a children's 
book with very few words, and one of the 'suspect' words appears, 
although it could be in a totally innocent context, bam! The 
children's book is going to get rated as adult.  I had that 
happen a few months ago with a board book I was proofreading!

Just guessing here, of course. smile.

Judy s.

EVAN REESE wrote:
> What determines adult content is ultimately the proofreader. Bookshare's 
> computer can mark a book either Adult or not, using some secret 
> algorithm that staff refuses to divulge to us, but the proofreader can 
> change the Bookshare computer's choice if he/she feels that a change is 
> justified. It used to be either the submitter and/or the proofreader, 
> but Bookshare took that choice away from submitters and seems to have no 
> inclination to give it back.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: