[bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel

  • From: "gwen tweedy" <gstweedy@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:35:57 -0500

That would be wonderful.
If it would happen.
Gwen

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Melissa Smith 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:07 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel


  I don't see why not. It has been suggested here more than once. Currently all 
is still the same, but you never know what they might be working on.

  Melissa Smith


  On 3/27/2010 6:50 PM, gwen tweedy wrote:
  > I didn't think of that. Couldn't they take the adult content off
  > altogether and just put the little labels on there the tags of what
  > is in them and not rate them would that work? Gwen
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Melissa Smith"
  > <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent:
  > Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:17 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For
  > wish list: more books by Elie Weisel
  > 
  > 
  >> The reason many consider it censorship is that, only those over 18
  >> are able to download the books marked adult content. There are some
  >> books, or so I've heard, that are marked adult content, but are
  >> required reading for high school students. Most high school
  >> students aren't over 18, and therefore, couldn't download the
  >> books. When I was in high school, I read several books that could
  >> be marked as having adult content.
  >> 
  >> Melissa Smith
  >> 
  >> 
  >> On 3/27/2010 4:10 PM, gwen tweedy wrote:
  >>> But I'm  not talking about Censorship, in fact it  wouldn't be
  >>> censorship at all. It would just be telling about the language
  >>> content or other in the book. It wouldn't mean a person couldn't
  >>> read it, nor would it mean anyone was trying to stop them from
  >>> reading it. It would just mean if a person didn't want to stumble
  >>> upon it, they wouldn't need to that is all. To me there is no
  >>> censorship to it. Because it's not telling you can nor can't, nor
  >>> is it barring any books. It's simply a designation for those who
  >>> feel more comfortable knowing fully what they are down loading. 
  >>> TV says PG-13 R G and on it goes, does that mean people don't
  >>> watch the shows oh and I forgot X-rating in movies or shows, does
  >>> that mean folks don't nor can't watch them. Certainly not, a body
  >>> can do what a person wants and likes, it is simply a label
  >>> designation. It doesn't mean a person can, nor a person can't! It
  >>> means absolutely nothing, except a designation. I guess I don't
  >>> feel that is censorship. If you were told what to do and not to
  >>> do, if the head here said no no we can't have this or that book
  >>> up, then you'd have real reason to call it censorship, because
  >>> then they would be squelching your rights as you would see them. 
  >>> But no one has done that, nor will they. It is the same access to
  >>> the same books no lock and key, just simply letters for those who
  >>> wish to know what is  in it. Nothing more, nothing less no
  >>> censorship involved. Gwen
  >>> 
  >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Loran Bailey"
  >>> <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent:
  >>> Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:29 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re:
  >>> For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel
  >>> 
  >>> 
  >>>> Bingo! And I am one of those who does not check it for
  >>>> anything., As far as I am concerned it is completely
  >>>> unjustified to prohibit anyone from reading anything he or she
  >>>> wants because of status. Can you imagine it if some self
  >>>> appointed member of the morality police decided that people who
  >>>> are blind should not be allowed to read certain things because
  >>>> it happens to offend that morality policeman's sensibilities
  >>>> without regard to how the blind person might feel about it?
  >>>> 
  >>>> 
  >>>> _     _      _
  >>>> 
  >>>> "As a woman I have no country. As a woman my country is the
  >>>> world" Virginia Woolf
  >>>> 
  >>>> The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder Press: 
  >>>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com Granma International: 
  >>>> http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html ----- Original Message
  >>>> ----- From: "Melissa Smith" <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> To:
  >>>> <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010
  >>>> 8:02 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books
  >>>> by Elie Weisel
  >>>> 
  >>>> 
  >>>>> The reason that the designation doesn't make a lot of sense,
  >>>>> is that the proofer can uncheck or check the adult content
  >>>>> designation. Many feel that the adult content is a form of
  >>>>> censorship, and don't check it for anything.
  >>>>> 
  >>>>> Melissa Smith
  >>>>> 
  >>>>> 
  >>>>> On 3/27/2010 1:32 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
  >>>>>> It is easy for anyone to download books that are full of
  >>>>>> sex scenes, and not even "nice" sex. I've been disappointed
  >>>>>> by some books of Robert Heinlein. Any child can download
  >>>>>> these. I'll probably change my setting to include "adult"
  >>>>>> books, since the designation seems not to make much sense.
  >>>>>> 
  >>>>>> John
  >>>>>> 
  >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:25:23AM -0500, Valerie Maples
  >>>>>> wrote:
  >>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> Someone told us that there is an actual standard because
  >>>>>>> of the grant that rates books based on word frequencies
  >>>>>>> and situations that cause them to generate the adult
  >>>>>>> material designation. I do believe the F. word is one of
  >>>>>>> the ones that is considered serious and is an automatic
  >>>>>>> designation. A series of moderate occurrences can also
  >>>>>>> generate the adult designation. It makes sense that there
  >>>>>>> would be a criterion with so many books being available
  >>>>>>> to young readers so that it would remove accidental
  >>>>>>> inappropriate downloads.
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> Having said that, apparently there were a couple of books
  >>>>>>> that could find no reason for those designations, those
  >>>>>>> they allowed a proofreader to remove it if there was
  >>>>>>> absolutely no risk to young readers. I'm not trying to
  >>>>>>> start a controversy here, just state what I was told how
  >>>>>>> the adult designation came to be utilized. As a parent,
  >>>>>>> even though Nichole is not completely independent in
  >>>>>>> downloading, I am grateful that there is some boundary.
  >>>>>>> It is easy enough for a child to get an exemption with
  >>>>>>> parental approval.
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> Valerie
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:59 PM, Jamie Yates, CPhT wrote:
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>>> Some books get marked as adult because the proofreader
  >>>>>>>> finds the material to be very sensitive. I only mark
  >>>>>>>> books adult if they are sexually graphic but often
  >>>>>>>> Bookshare takes and marks my books adult for me. I find
  >>>>>>>> the Penny Warner books about the small town newspaper
  >>>>>>>> reporter who is deaf always get marked adult because
  >>>>>>>> she is fond of the f word. Her sex scenes are always
  >>>>>>>> very very very bland so it isn't the few and far
  >>>>>>>> between sex scenes, it has to be her colorful
  >>>>>>>> language.
  >>>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>>> I've scanned many other books which Bookshare
  >>>>>>>> automatically marked adult and as the scanner I cannot
  >>>>>>>> unmark it. Only the proofreader can do it.
  >>>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>>> I'm told that many Elie Weisel books are now required
  >>>>>>>> reading in high schools these days so probably
  >>>>>>>> Bookshare should be made aware of the situation so they
  >>>>>>>> can assess it.
  >>>>>>>> 
  >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  >>>>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word
  >>>>>>> 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
  >>>>>>> list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself
  >>>>>>> in the subject line.
  >>>>>>> 
  >>>>>> 
  >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  >>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word
  >>>>> 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
  >>>>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
  >>>>> subject line.
  >>>>> 
  >>>> 
  >>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  >>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe'
  >>>> by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of available
  >>>> commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
  >>>> 
  >>>> 
  >>> 
  >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe'
  >>> by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of available
  >>> commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
  >>> 
  >>> 
  >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by
  >> itself in the subject line.  To get a list of available commands,
  >> put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
  >> 
  >> 
  > 
  > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to 
  > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by
  > itself in the subject line.  To get a list of available commands, put
  > the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
  > 
  > 

Other related posts: