That would be wonderful. If it would happen. Gwen ----- Original Message ----- From: Melissa Smith To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:07 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel I don't see why not. It has been suggested here more than once. Currently all is still the same, but you never know what they might be working on. Melissa Smith On 3/27/2010 6:50 PM, gwen tweedy wrote: > I didn't think of that. Couldn't they take the adult content off > altogether and just put the little labels on there the tags of what > is in them and not rate them would that work? Gwen > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Melissa Smith" > <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: > Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:17 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For > wish list: more books by Elie Weisel > > >> The reason many consider it censorship is that, only those over 18 >> are able to download the books marked adult content. There are some >> books, or so I've heard, that are marked adult content, but are >> required reading for high school students. Most high school >> students aren't over 18, and therefore, couldn't download the >> books. When I was in high school, I read several books that could >> be marked as having adult content. >> >> Melissa Smith >> >> >> On 3/27/2010 4:10 PM, gwen tweedy wrote: >>> But I'm not talking about Censorship, in fact it wouldn't be >>> censorship at all. It would just be telling about the language >>> content or other in the book. It wouldn't mean a person couldn't >>> read it, nor would it mean anyone was trying to stop them from >>> reading it. It would just mean if a person didn't want to stumble >>> upon it, they wouldn't need to that is all. To me there is no >>> censorship to it. Because it's not telling you can nor can't, nor >>> is it barring any books. It's simply a designation for those who >>> feel more comfortable knowing fully what they are down loading. >>> TV says PG-13 R G and on it goes, does that mean people don't >>> watch the shows oh and I forgot X-rating in movies or shows, does >>> that mean folks don't nor can't watch them. Certainly not, a body >>> can do what a person wants and likes, it is simply a label >>> designation. It doesn't mean a person can, nor a person can't! It >>> means absolutely nothing, except a designation. I guess I don't >>> feel that is censorship. If you were told what to do and not to >>> do, if the head here said no no we can't have this or that book >>> up, then you'd have real reason to call it censorship, because >>> then they would be squelching your rights as you would see them. >>> But no one has done that, nor will they. It is the same access to >>> the same books no lock and key, just simply letters for those who >>> wish to know what is in it. Nothing more, nothing less no >>> censorship involved. Gwen >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Loran Bailey" >>> <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: >>> Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:29 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: >>> For wish list: more books by Elie Weisel >>> >>> >>>> Bingo! And I am one of those who does not check it for >>>> anything., As far as I am concerned it is completely >>>> unjustified to prohibit anyone from reading anything he or she >>>> wants because of status. Can you imagine it if some self >>>> appointed member of the morality police decided that people who >>>> are blind should not be allowed to read certain things because >>>> it happens to offend that morality policeman's sensibilities >>>> without regard to how the blind person might feel about it? >>>> >>>> >>>> _ _ _ >>>> >>>> "As a woman I have no country. As a woman my country is the >>>> world" Virginia Woolf >>>> >>>> The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder Press: >>>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com Granma International: >>>> http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html ----- Original Message >>>> ----- From: "Melissa Smith" <mdsmith25@xxxxxxxx> To: >>>> <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 >>>> 8:02 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For wish list: more books >>>> by Elie Weisel >>>> >>>> >>>>> The reason that the designation doesn't make a lot of sense, >>>>> is that the proofer can uncheck or check the adult content >>>>> designation. Many feel that the adult content is a form of >>>>> censorship, and don't check it for anything. >>>>> >>>>> Melissa Smith >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/27/2010 1:32 AM, John J. Boyer wrote: >>>>>> It is easy for anyone to download books that are full of >>>>>> sex scenes, and not even "nice" sex. I've been disappointed >>>>>> by some books of Robert Heinlein. Any child can download >>>>>> these. I'll probably change my setting to include "adult" >>>>>> books, since the designation seems not to make much sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:25:23AM -0500, Valerie Maples >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Someone told us that there is an actual standard because >>>>>>> of the grant that rates books based on word frequencies >>>>>>> and situations that cause them to generate the adult >>>>>>> material designation. I do believe the F. word is one of >>>>>>> the ones that is considered serious and is an automatic >>>>>>> designation. A series of moderate occurrences can also >>>>>>> generate the adult designation. It makes sense that there >>>>>>> would be a criterion with so many books being available >>>>>>> to young readers so that it would remove accidental >>>>>>> inappropriate downloads. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having said that, apparently there were a couple of books >>>>>>> that could find no reason for those designations, those >>>>>>> they allowed a proofreader to remove it if there was >>>>>>> absolutely no risk to young readers. I'm not trying to >>>>>>> start a controversy here, just state what I was told how >>>>>>> the adult designation came to be utilized. As a parent, >>>>>>> even though Nichole is not completely independent in >>>>>>> downloading, I am grateful that there is some boundary. >>>>>>> It is easy enough for a child to get an exemption with >>>>>>> parental approval. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Valerie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:59 PM, Jamie Yates, CPhT wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some books get marked as adult because the proofreader >>>>>>>> finds the material to be very sensitive. I only mark >>>>>>>> books adult if they are sexually graphic but often >>>>>>>> Bookshare takes and marks my books adult for me. I find >>>>>>>> the Penny Warner books about the small town newspaper >>>>>>>> reporter who is deaf always get marked adult because >>>>>>>> she is fond of the f word. Her sex scenes are always >>>>>>>> very very very bland so it isn't the few and far >>>>>>>> between sex scenes, it has to be her colorful >>>>>>>> language. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've scanned many other books which Bookshare >>>>>>>> automatically marked adult and as the scanner I cannot >>>>>>>> unmark it. Only the proofreader can do it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm told that many Elie Weisel books are now required >>>>>>>> reading in high schools these days so probably >>>>>>>> Bookshare should be made aware of the situation so they >>>>>>>> can assess it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>>>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word >>>>>>> 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a >>>>>>> list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself >>>>>>> in the subject line. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word >>>>> 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>>>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the >>>>> subject line. >>>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' >>>> by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available >>>> commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' >>> by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available >>> commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>> >>> >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by >> itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, >> put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by > itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put > the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > >