atw: Re: The Queen's English? - now OFF TOPIC

  • From: "Hallett, Michelle" <Michelle.Hallett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:18:19 +1000

Not sure I agree with you there Christine. I can understand that any 20
year old woman had stars in her eyes about marriage, even an
aristocratic one. Add to that the media fuss and a young person who
hasn't yet come to realise that the media is all about fuss with no
substance.
 
I think Charles didn't have the guts to challenge mummy and daddy when
he first met Camilla and they said she wasn't suitable to be Queen. So
they all took advantage of naive 20 year old Diana. It took Diana's
death to make changes to all of them and I think both Charles and
Camilla owe her.
 
Michelle
 

________________________________

From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christine Kent
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2007 2:39 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: The Queen's English? - now OFF TOPIC


My God!!!  You girls are Sooooooo nasty.  There is nothing funny in
abusing a woman who does not stimulate stereotypical male fantasies.
 
My respect for Charles went UP over the Camilla thing.  A man saw virtue
in a mature age woman who was his emotional and intellectual equal, and
was bored witless with the silly little "princess" who failed to
understand what everyone else knew, that she was no more than a brood
mare.  She was brought up as a aristocrat so had no excuse for not
understanding how the royals have always conducted their marriages.
Poor little Mary is discovering that little truth now too - but she has
more excuse for believing in the fairytale princess myth than Dianna had
- at least she was not raised in those circles.
 
It's good that one man one earth has some depth.  Gives us hope that
there may be some more.  Ahhh, Charlie, the man of my dreams!
 
ck


________________________________

        From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hope, Debbie 
        Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2007 4:23 PM
        To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: atw: Re: The Queen's English? - now OFF TOPIC
        
        
        Thanks Matilda--
        You summed it up perfectly with one word  - 'adulterer'. I was
actually going to add 'cow' in there somewhere as well.
        Debbie

________________________________

        From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MATILDA REICH
        Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2007 4:18 PM
        To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: atw: Re: The Queen's English?
        
        
        It's not harsh, it's funny!  Everyone knows bonnie Prince
Charlie loves his horses, even two legged ones.
        The demise of Diana had more to do with her brain, emotional
stability, marrying an adulterer at such a tender age, than her looks.
Poor lass.

        >>> slb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 22/05/07 4:04 pm >>>
        
        Jeez, Debbie, that's a bit harsh.
        
        Would you say that to her face? To anyone?
        
        I have zero interest in things royal, but Diana Spencer was good
looking 
        and look where that all ended up.
        
        Stuart
        
        Debbie Hope said:
        > Camilla the Fugly
        **************************************************
        
        


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date:
21/05/2007 2:01 PM




*****************************************************************************
This email, and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended 
for use by the addressee only. The confidential nature of the information 
contained in the email and/or file attachment is not waived, lost or destroyed 
if it is sent to other than the addressee. Use or dissemination of the 
information contained in the email and/or file attachment, by a recipient other 
than the addressee, may cause commercial damage to both/either the sender 
and/or addressee. If you are not the addressee of this email/file attachment 
contact the sender immediately and delete this email/file attachment. 

All email communications to and from this company are filtered and stored for 
risk management purposes in accordance with our Computer and Email Policies. 
Please contact our Privacy Manager on (02) 8668 6947 if you would like further 
information about our Policies in regard to these issues.

*****************************************************************************

Other related posts: