atw: Re: The Queen's English? - now OFF TOPIC
- From: "MATILDA REICH" <MATILDA.REICH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:50:27 +1000
You need a sense of humour, Christine.
There's nothing admirable in taking a young girl up the church ailse on
the ugly pretense that he loved her. He should have petitioned to marry
the love of his life rather than "live in sin" and devastate some naive
and witless girl and use her like a brooding mare, on the orders of his
mother.
She was a natural mother and innocently loved Charles and probably
could not cope with the emotional devastation of the lie of her
marriage. How knowing can one be at the age of 19, even if they are in
those social circles.
>>> christine_kent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 22/05/07 4:39 pm >>>
My God!!! You girls are Sooooooo nasty. There is nothing funny in
abusing a woman who does not stimulate stereotypical male fantasies.
My respect for Charles went UP over the Camilla thing. A man saw
virtue in a mature age woman who was his emotional and intellectual
equal, and was bored witless with the silly little "princess" who failed
to understand what everyone else knew, that she was no more than a brood
mare. She was brought up as a aristocrat so had no excuse for not
understanding how the royals have always conducted their marriages.
Poor little Mary is discovering that little truth now too - but she has
more excuse for believing in the fairytale princess myth than Dianna had
- at least she was not raised in those circles.
It's good that one man one earth has some depth. Gives us hope that
there may be some more. Ahhh, Charlie, the man of my dreams!
ck
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hope, Debbie
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2007 4:23 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: The Queen's English? - now OFF TOPIC
Thanks Matilda--
You summed it up perfectly with one word - 'adulterer'. I was actually
going to add 'cow' in there somewhere as well.
Debbie
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MATILDA REICH
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2007 4:18 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: The Queen's English?
It's not harsh, it's funny! Everyone knows bonnie Prince Charlie loves
his horses, even two legged ones.
The demise of Diana had more to do with her brain, emotional stability,
marrying an adulterer at such a tender age, than her looks. Poor lass.
>>> slb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 22/05/07 4:04 pm >>>
Jeez, Debbie, that's a bit harsh.
Would you say that to her face? To anyone?
I have zero interest in things royal, but Diana Spencer was good
looking
and look where that all ended up.
Stuart
Debbie Hope said:
> Camilla the Fugly
**************************************************
----------------------------------------------------------- This
message has been scanned by MailSweeper.
-----------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date:
21/05/2007 2:01 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sydney Water's Every Drop Counts Business Program
Winner of the 2006 Stockholm Industry Water Award
-----------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email is confidential. If you are not the nominated recipient,
please immediately delete this email, destroy all copies and inform the sender.
Sydney Water Corporation (Sydney Water) prohibits the unauthorised copying or
distribution of this email. This email does not necessarily express the views
of Sydney Water. Sydney Water does not warrant nor guarantee that this email
communication is free from errors, virus, interception or interference.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts: