atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- From: Peter G Martin <peter.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rhardman <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:28:29 +1000
rhardman:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:31:48 +0200, you wrote:
>
> There is another dimension that may be relevent.
> Will your manual:
> a) be used in places where the users have English as a second
> language, or b) be translated into another language?
>
> In the first case, the metaphor could fail completely where
> the reader has only the narrow vocabulary of his or her
> speciality. In the second case, the extra effort and
> inspiration required of the translator to localise the
> metaphor may not be available.
Yep, and while there may be some truth in that, the difficulty may
also be exaggerated.
The fact is that change is at much at work in other language groups
as it is in our own (largely because the technology is at work there too).
The influence of English is very significant in many technological terms.
Let's just take a preliminary glance, and look at some European
languages:
clone
an identical copy (of something).
Dutch: kloon (de)
French: clone (m)
German: Klon (m)
Italian: clone
Spanish: clon
clone
to make an identical copy of (something).
Dutch: klonen
French: cloner
German: klonen
Italian: clonare
Spanish: clonar
Then a hint that perhaps metaphorical
use applies in one other language ?
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - klon (biol.), dubbelgångare (vard.), robot (vard. om människa)
v. - klona (biol.), göra en exakt kopia av (vard.)
And as for Asian language groups... here are two important ones...
Mandarin Chinese (PinYin)
kèlóng
Japanese
kuro-n
Are we +really+ having a problem here ? Somehow I think not.
I would venture to suggest that a good translator is really not going
to have too much trouble with the word "clone" and its associated
concepts.
It does help that many different nations have contributed significantly
to development in this area.
I'll bet they've got PCs aplenty, too.
--Peter M
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- From: rhardman
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- From: rhardman