atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- From: "Steve Hudson" <wordheretic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:25:13 +1000
Cloning is not the same as copying a clone. They both produce separate
clones, but one is a true cloning process and the other is a simple copy.
_____
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nikki Ward
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006 6:25 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Clone vs Clone
Hi there...
Here's tricky one for y'all.
I am presently writing a user manual for a Linux version of 'Ghost'.. and I
am battling with a 'Clone' concept
I have to explain to the user that they can 'clone' a machine (as in COPY
the entire contents of a machine's hard disk drive)
versus they can also make clones from the 'cloned image' (As in make a new
machine based on the image that has been cloned from another machine)
Sheesh.. I just seem to go around in circles with this one..
Heeelp.
Nikki
- References:
- atw: Clone vs Clone
- From: Nikki Ward
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- » atw: Re: Clone vs Clone
- atw: Clone vs Clone
- From: Nikki Ward