[AR] Re: thinking big once more

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:30:37 -0700

Ah. The light dawns. My recollection is they went from plated-closeout cores for the Merlin to 3D printed. (I'm sure someone will correct me if needed.) Keeping the new engine within the max envelope of their current printing machinery could explain this decision to go for ultra-high pressure.

Mind, my first guess would be that larger printers would be a lower-risk solution than developing new engines at an unprececedentely high pressure. But that's just a guess, presumably SpaceX has reason to think otherwise.

Henry

On 9/28/2016 11:10 PM, Jonathan Goff wrote:

I think it's more that Elon wanted to keep similar size rocket hardware
to what their factory was already setup to do, but wanted as much thrust
and Isp as he could get.

~Jon

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Henry Vanderbilt
<hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Could be for the same reason Shuttle went for relatively
    high-pressure main engines: Combining good sea-level Isp and good
    vacuum Isp in minimum vehicle aft cross-section area.


    On 9/28/2016 5:33 PM, Alexander Ponomarenko wrote:

        Still wondering why they selected champion
        chamber pressure.




Other related posts: