[AR] Re: "Direct" Hydrogen Peroxide engines

  • From: qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:15:30 -0600

Still trying to figure out other they got it to fully decompose with so little silver.
I'll redo my silver decomp figures but to be that's way high for .5" cat pack.


Robert

At 04:20 AM 9/19/2016, you wrote:

Thank you for the 2003 Ponzo pdf. This is tech an amateur can only ask specialized companies to realize for him. Making the photo etching masks for the platelets is the only thing an amateur could get away with as far as I can see.
As to the internal geometry of those etch masks: they will require several trial versions. Could take years solo.
Platelet stacks can be pressure bonded in a vacuum oven (with or without an extra bonding metal layer) typically by putting a weight on them. Had this done for 0.2 mm stainless sheets 10 years ago: special company again.
Could become an expensive project!
Problem with a monolithic pack is it would be difficult to inspect what the internal erosion did without destroying is.
I wonder if Aerojet ever commercialized such monolithic packs.
jd

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: zondag 18 september 2016 22:36
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: "Direct" Hydrogen Peroxide engines

Here's the PDF

Robert

At 02:11 PM 9/18/2016, you wrote:
>Robert wrote on 180916:
>
> >That is what Aerojet did with their monolithic cat pack and I'm
> working on a similar design as we are talking about this I am having a
> problem understanding how they created enough silver surface to
> decompose the peroxide in a half inch though. Microfluidics can achieve super mixing, like used in monolithic multichannel chemical analyzers. But I have not heard about those much anymore.
>
>Do you have a URL of that particular Aerojet monolithic pack research
>paper mentioning a silver catalyst layer inside?
>
>jd
>
>

Other related posts: