It would be ironic if the cause were a pad fire, caused by static.
You know, a static fire.
On 2016-09-01 12:31, Rand Simberg wrote:
We don't yet know if the rocket was a cause or a casualty.
On 2016-09-01 09:26, David Spain wrote: RUD during a static fire test?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 1, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Steve Traugott <stevegt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
(In the spirit of useless speculation that is way too early...) Is it
normally fair to say that, if the fuselage is more or less intact, that would
indicate some external mishap rather than internal overpressure?
(In the spirit of trying to learn something...) I see @lars_0 thinking about
liquid air management on twitter; what are we talking about? Insulation,
runoff drains and guides, and clean drip trays?
(In the spirit of adding to "things worth thinking about"...) I'll toss
refuel ops static electricity management into the hat; mostly good grounding
afaik (based only on USAF flightline experience).
