[ZeroBrane Studio] Re: Debugging question
- From: "Clive Monk" <clive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <zerobrane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:02:38 +0100
I guess you are right. The structure is really my habit in other language
environments of separating a project into sub-projects where each
sub-project has specific concerns - data access / business objects etc.. I
always have a 'Common' project which has functions that are likely to be
shared by all higher level projects e.g. error handling / reporting.
Ideally, adding a link to a project rather than the modules themselves would
preserve this approach, much as Visual Studio does but it isn't such a big
deal with my Vera development so I will place them in the one directory on
the pc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul K" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zerobrane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 8:38 PM
Subject: [ZeroBrane Studio] Re: Debugging question
Hi Clive,
> it is normally the case that all the files are held in a single
> directory, essentially a bin deployment directory and as such probably
> won't
> match the source project structure.
Right, but what stops you from doing the opposite: making the project
structure on desktop to match the one on the box by putting all files
in one folder?
Maybe you can send me you project structure (off-list) so I have a
better picture of where the mismatch is? Thank you.
Paul.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 8571 (20130715) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 8571 (20130715) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
