[Wittrs] Re: Original and derived intentionality
- From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:10 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jrstern" <jrstern@...> wrote:
<snip>
> > You wrote here:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/message/2906
> >
> > "Making it hostage to deciding what it means to be "first person" other
> > than a physical system, pretty much guarantees you're going around in
> > circles."
>
> The scare quotes there, not to mention the rest of the sentence,
> are denouncing the term, not using it.
>
> Josh
But denouncing it is using it, too. You still have to be clear on what it is
(or what you think it is) you are denouncing. It's a fair question to ask, no?
SWM
=========================================
Manage Your AMR subscription: //www.freelists.org/list/wittrsamr
For all your Wittrs needs: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
