[C] [Wittrs] Re: Wittgenstein on Religious Belief
- From: gprimero <gerardoprim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:25:50 -0500
(JPDeMouy) A last point. These approaches start from the idea that the believer
and non-believer have substantive disagreements then proceed to show how what
the believer has to say might be understood in a way that would be perfectly
reasonable by the non-believer' s lights. That is one possibility, but
Wittgenstein also wants us to consider another: that sometimes the differences
between the believer and non-believer may run so deep that they can't even
really disagree.
(Gerardo) In which cases you think we could say so? (that "they can't even
really disagree"). Could you give some examples?
Regards,
Gerardo.
==========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
