>But, while I have windows servers that don't go down unless I put them >down (like the file server I just unplugged from its UPS while >cleaning up... everyone makes mistakes!) I generally agree with you. >It takes a disciplined admin to make a windows box stay up on its own. Not that hard with win2k, NT was a nightmare though. > > From: Chris Berry > > The goal is to be about a 1.5 by next year, as a 1 > > is basically impossible with any sort of reasonable budget. > >1 is impossible with Windows! Depends on whether you're talking per server or from the users point of view. With sufficient backups, clustering, failover etc. windows can get to five nines, but that kind of reliability takes cash. If you're talking per server, when was the last time you did a kernel update on a linux box without rebooting? Chris Berry compjma@xxxxxxxxxxx Systems Administrator JM Associates "Live dangerously, overclock your servers." _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm