[windows2000] Re: Something better than remote desktops snap-in
- From: "Ray Costanzo" <ray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:04:06 -0400
Hmm, uh, no... I'm all about making big assumptions and then blaming others
for things. Perhaps I ought to go look for that. Thanks Ken Zig!
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: Wed 8/20/2008 1:49 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Something better than remote desktops snap-in
Are you certain you got the newest version of Rdesktops from the Vista/2008
admin tools?
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ray Costanzo <ray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This looks promising. Thanks Mark. You were the only one who actually
understood that I wasn't looking for a protocol replacement here, just a
container for my sessions. :)
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mark Lane
Sent: Wed 8/20/2008 11:55 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Something better than remote desktops snap-in
I am a fan of VisionApp Remote Desktop:
http://visionapp.com/1683.0.html
It does for RDP sessions what tabbed browsing does for web pages. You
can customize each session, including the port.
Their old version 1.5 was free, and I am still using it. Their latest
is $69.
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray Costanzo
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:05 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Something better than remote desktops snap-in
Hi group,
I cannot remember the name of some small freeware product that I used a
few years back that was similar to the remote desktops snapin for the MMC, but
better. Any ideas? I just installed the latest (only?) version of this
snapin, and still no support for alternate ports. Weak!
Thanks
Other related posts:
