[THIN] Re: Zone Data Collector query
- From: Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:28:46 -0700
Hello,
Two controllers per zone, however, the do NOT need to be physical machines.
I would make them virtual machines along with all other platform type
services (SQL, EdgeSight, Licensing, Web Interface/StoreFront, App-V, etc)
Also, in your case, I may only do one zone given the bandwidth between
sites. One set of resource per site (one dedicated ZDC VM per site).
Worker Groups and preferences can be used to control traffic to each site.
Joe
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need some help with configuring the Zone data Collector roles on my
> XenApp 6.5 farm. We have the following:
>
> - 1 XenApp 6.5 farm
> - 1 VM Server
> - 10 XenApp 6.5 Physical servers spread across 2 sites
> - Sites are connected with dual Gig links
>
> Potential design
> Site 1 Prod
> 1 x Dedicated VM Server configured as Controller and Session-host
> 5 x XenApp 6.5 (Session Host mode only)
>
> Site 2 Prod/BCM
> 5 x XenApp 6.5 (1 x Controller and Session-host, 4 x Session Host mode
> only)
>
> For redundancy I need a Controller server in Site 2. Should I use one of
> the existing Physical servers and configure as Controller and Session-host
> or should I create another VM server dedicated for this role? Is 2
> dedicated servers for a farm of 10 servers overkill? My preference is to
> use one of the Physical servers so it will host user sessions and be a
> controller. Another option could be to run all 10 servers in Controller
> and Session-host mode or is this bad practice?
>
>
> Thanks
> Ang
>
Other related posts:
