[THIN] Re: SAN Benefits for Citrix

  • From: "Luchette, Jon" <JLuchette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:29:52 -0400

right but my point is that he was saying that "booting from san" would
cost you more than just using the san for other disks which I don't
agree with.  you would need the adaptors either way...
 
the concept of booting from san doesn't cost you anything as compared to
normal use of the san on a server.
 
 
_______________________________________________
Jon Luchette

Emerson Hospital
Technology Specialist III
Work: 978-287-3369
Cell:  978-360-1379

jluchette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________

 
 

________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Matheis
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SAN Benefits for Citrix


You still need 2 adapters (for redundancy) per server, plus SAN ports,
usually there is management software associated with the SAN which is
licensed per connection, etc....  This person is problem referring to
all of the overall costs that add about $5k or more each time you hook a
device up.  
 

Thanks 

Jeff Matheis 
Kimball International, Inc. 
812-482-8302 
jmathei@xxxxxxxxxxx 

 

________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Luchette, Jon
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:14 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SAN Benefits for Citrix


well you really don't need more disk to boot from SAN than you would if
you were just using the SAN for regular storage.  especially for citrix,
you don't need alot of disk for citrix boxes...
 
 
_______________________________________________
Jon Luchette

Emerson Hospital
Technology Specialist III
Work: 978-287-3369
Cell:  978-360-1379

jluchette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________

 
 

________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Eldon
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:59 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SAN Benefits for Citrix


my understanding is that it was disk cost - the # of spindles needing to
be allocated, multiplied by the number of servers booting from SAN.....


On 7/19/06, Luchette, Jon <JLuchette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

        right, what is he talking about. because if he is talking about
the hba's then that is not specific to booting from the san, but just
something that you will need if you want to use your san at all...? 
         
        what is he talking about?
        
         
         
        _______________________________________________
        Jon Luchette
        
        Emerson Hospital
        Technology Specialist III
        
        Work: 978-287-3369
        Cell:  978-360-1379

        jluchette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        _______________________________________________

         
         

________________________________

        From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Landin, Mark 
        Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:23 AM
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Subject: [THIN] Re: SAN Benefits for Citrix
        
         
        
        What cost does he associate with boot-from-SAN?


________________________________

                From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eldon 
                Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:13 AM
                To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                Subject: [THIN] SAN Benefits for Citrix
                
                 
                My organization just installed an EMC SAN and I was
thinking how I could use it to benefit my current (XP FR3) and future
(upgrading to PS 4) environment.  How can I use the SAN to enhance my
Citrix deployment (currently 15 servers, 250 concurrent users, hardware
become outdated and soon needs replacement)?  I was told by our SAN
Admin that booting new servers from the SAN would probably be cost
prohibitive. 


Other related posts: