[THIN] Re: Citrix on VMWare

  • From: Durf <stygmata@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:22:37 -0400

I've had no problems at all with it, in terms of stability and reliability. 

On 5/10/05, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  What has been your take on Microsoft's Virtual Server? Word on the street 
> is it is still very unreliable and is worse now than when MS purchased the 
> technology.
> 
>  Joe
> 
>   ------------------------------
>  
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On 
> Behalf Of *Durf
> *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2005 8:18 PM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Citrix on VMWare
>  
>  Soooo...you're saying that pig of a Visual FoxPro based app that 
> regularly pegs the processor and that *mumble* client of mine runs isn't 
> going to benefit by virtualization? o_0
> 
> Actually, I jest, partially. I am in the middle of deploying some Citrix 
> servers on Microsoft Virtual Server '05, but the major reason is business 
> continuity, not performance. The client is willing to take a tradeoff on 
> hardware and performance vs. recoverability and management for the following 
> reasons:
> 
> - System updates for the app come out fairly often, and the system needs a 
> rapid rollback strategy
> - Client is in the middle of an acquisition phase and needs to be able to 
> deploy more resources quickly
> - Client loves having machines that can be clones, backed up, rolled back, 
> and versioned according to those needs
> - Client is willing to oversubscribe on hardware in order to have 
> scalability, reliability and redundancy
> - Client is planning on having a copy of their VM image taken to a remote 
> datacenter for disaster recovery purposes
> 
> The basic strategy and argument for having app servers on virtual machines 
> is to overspend on hardware capacity by 20-40% in order to have rapid 
> failover, fail-back and recovery. We've demonstrated being able to roll back 
> to a previous version of the Virtual Hard Disk file via Volume Shadow Copy 
> in a case where the system becomes compromised by spyware or a bad 
> application update, and that has become a compelling business case for 
> virtualization.
>  
> On 5/9/05, *Ron Oglesby* <roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> 
> Well it depends.
> 
> I run a one-off server build on it with low utilization right now. I 
> also run my prod WI/CSG on it.
> 
> Now I just did a presentation on this at Briforum and the real key is
> what your bottleneck is on Phys machines. If you run into virtual
> address space limitations on the OS but have very low Proc and mem 
> utilization you probably have a real good fit. Now if you run into
> limitations of physical resources, those limitations will show up a
> little earlier in a VM environment.
> 
> You have to remember the idea, the processor time is being scheduled, 
> and while it is a very light overhead it is still an overhead.
> Now the next thing I can say is people running into OS limits have great
> success, People with crappy apps (Ie lots of ring 0 system calls,
> context switches etc) can experience a performance reduction. I had one 
> client that with everything set per VMware recommendations and pegging
> VMs to single procs still lost 40% of their users per proc when compared
> to physical machines. This was a result of the applications being run. 
> 
> If you have really well behaved/written apps you can have better
> results.
> 
> Now, once you get beyond those initial performance things there are
> other reasons for deploying Citrix (or any server) on VM architecture, 
> but that's another thread.
> 
> Ron
> 
> Ron Oglesby
> Director of Technical Architecture
> 
> RapidApp, Chicago
> Office: 312 372 7188
> Mobile: 815 325 7618
> email: roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On
> Behalf Of msemon@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:39 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix on VMWare
> 
> I am not sure I would put this on your primary production farm. We saw
> some
> performance issues with a client who had installed on primary production
> farm. You might look at secondary silo. Also, check out Ron's book on 
> VMWare ESX server which should be in book stores any day.
> 
> Mike
> 
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Bermuda Boy phits_right@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 10:52:21 -0300 
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Citrix on VMWare
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I was wondering whether anybody had performed the "daunting?" task of
> installing any of the Metaframe suite on VMWare? I was thinking of 
> putting
> CSG and/or the Web Interface server in a virtualized environment.
> 
> Your feed back is encouraged :-)
> 
> Bermuda Boy
> 
> Sean B. McLaughlin esq.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
> 
> ********************************************************
> This Weeks Sponsor: ThinPrint GmbH
> Now available: The new version .print Engine 6.2 with SSL encryption
> and certificate management.
> http://www.thinprint.com
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: 
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
> http://www.thinwiki.com
> *********************************************************** 
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> ******************************************************** 
> This Weeks Sponsor: ThinPrint GmbH
> Now available: The new version .print Engine 6.2 with SSL encryption
> and certificate management.
> http://www.thinprint.com
> ********************************************************** 
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
> http://www.thinwiki.com
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --------------
> Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute.
> But set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. 
>  



-- 
--------------
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute.
But set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

Other related posts: