[tcb] Re: OT: Ghia
- From: "w.wood" <evil.scientist.boo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:20:42 -0500
My wife's 74 isn't bad. It's too low for me though.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:19 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Personally I think the same thing applies with Ghias as the Type I bug;
> i.e., 67 is probably the best year and personally I wouldn't have a 68 or
> later. Any Ghia up through 67 is a pretty good car, given condition of
> course.
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 1/21/10, atx <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
>
> From: atx <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [tcb] OT: Ghia
>
> To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 7:59 PM
>
>
> I've got a buddy looking for a Ghia. He wants a running Ghia in good
> shape. Any years to avoid? Is there a big switch in 67 other than 12V?
> Thanks
>
> Jeff
>
> sent via iPhone
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
My Email Moniker
http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,1570570433.aspx
Other related posts:
