[swag] Re: Summary of Submission Guidelines
- From: "Chris Zaragoza" <czaragoz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <swag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 17:23:02 -0400
Well I have to say I more agree with the high quality less requirements aim
than the "we take any old crap you want to scribble down as long as it's
original and not pornographic" bit....
Just seems that if I was looking for artwork for my game and I found a site
making claims to be the end all answer to this need and it was 75% crap I'd
look elsewhere from then on.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Falconer" <falconernz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <swag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: [swag] Re: Summary of Submission Guidelines
> Well,
>
> I'm of the opinion that we want to keep this site as
> high quality as possible, both for Guild members and
> casual submitters. The difference I see between these
> two categories is that casual submitters aren't bound
> to any regular committments or the Online Journal
> reqs. The higher the standard of work on our pages,
> the more likely we'll be to attract better and better
> artists. I don't so much see it as being exclusive,
> as just aiming high. We can always lower our
> acceptance standards if we feel down the road that
> we're being too stingy, although I think consistancy
> from the outset is always preferable.
>
> However, I do see the validity of the arguements being
> expressed for the opposite policy, relaxing the expert
> reqs for casual submitters, and I am happy to yield to
> that, as it seems to be the popular view. As an
> Inquisitor, my position has to represent the
> philosophies and standards of the whole team at SWAG,
> so I'm completely cool to go with the majority on this
> one.
>
> Daniel Falconer (Reverend Strone).
>
> http://www.sold.com.au - The Sold.com.au Big Brand Sale
> - New PCs, notebooks, digital cameras, phones and more ... Sale ends June
12
>
Other related posts:
