[studiorecorder] Re: Normalization question

  • From: "Neal Ewers" <neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:56:38 -0500

So, guess what my negative peak was.  0 DB.  You're right again.

Neal



-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ROB MEREDITH
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1:45 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Normalization question


Neal:

The answer is that you need to look at the positive and the negative
peak. They normally don't match, and the one with the largest value is
used to determine the normalize offset. I'll bet your negative peak in
this case was very close to 0 to begin with. That would explain the
clipping when forcing the positive value to 0dB.

Note: this is normal; all audio programs work this way.

Rob Meredith

>>> neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/23/06 02:31PM >>>
Rob, On several occasions when using SR, I normalize a file to 0 DB and
when I check the measurements, the positive peak is something like minus
3.2 or something like that.  When I raise the volume to 0 with the
volume module, the file is distorted.  If I undo the volume change and
try normalizing again, I am told that the file is already at the level I
have set.  It is often a mono file.  I know there is an answer here, I
just don't know what it is.  I bet, however, that you do.  So, may we
have your wisdom on this one?
 
Neal
 
 




Other related posts: