Absolutely true. My argument had been to treat research issues at UG level slightly different than research at higher levels. Publishing papers may not be a usual research event in this world of Free Software, where validation part is mostly done by "users". I think the expert body understood the arguments. On 25/10/2010, jinesh kj <jinesh.k@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Its great news to hear. Usual evaluation mechanism of research works > wont be quite sufficient here and even a lot of innovation should go > in there i guess. On top since its a new idea we should be able to > represent a par quality work similar to ones coming out of big > institutes. As a matter of fact alliances can be forged with different > centers of excellence. Otherwise difficult task of representing > ourselves will be made easier. So great news to start with :) jinesh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "MES-FSUG" > group. > To post to this group, send email to mes-fsug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mes-fsug-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mes-fsug?hl=en > > Our IRC channel #mes-fsug at irc.freenode.net. Webpage for GNULabs @ MESCE > is at http://gnulabs.org/mesce/ > -- CK Raju -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "MES-FSUG" group. To post to this group, send email to mes-fsug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mes-fsug-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mes-fsug?hl=en Our IRC channel #mes-fsug at irc.freenode.net. Webpage for GNULabs @ MESCE is at http://gnulabs.org/mesce/ Wiki: http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Malappuram