DR
What did Israel gain and what did she risk losing?
Stan
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Feb 21, 2016 2:29 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Stanley?
Huh? Who said the attack on Golan Heights was known to USS LIBERTY, I did not
say that.
If anyone except Israel knew about the plan to attack, they had darned poor
security.
We need an investigation into this and we need to charge Israel with WAR CRIMES
if we find they intentionally murdered our neutral sailors and attacked a
neutral ship in International waters.
How would you feel if LIBERTY was USNS LIBERTY and the ship and an ARA R/O
named Stanley Blumenthal and Israel attacked YOUR ship and murdered your
shipmates?
73
DR
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David
How in the world is the attack on the Gola Heights a secret that only the
Liberty knew?
Stanley
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <djringjr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Feb 20, 2016 8:13 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
If lost terribly. If they were afraid USA was going to betrayalong time ally,
they were absolutely wrong, and if they thought that they could use the
telephone.
If they were afraid we would discover their plans to attack Golan Heights, they
should have changed plans.
It is.much more likely that we caught Israel committing a War Crime, and they
wanted to eliminate all witnesses.
David
On Feb 20, 2016 11:02 AM, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JS & DR
Do you consider that a proper reply to my question of what did Israel gain and
what did it risk
losing? Think, think, think.
Stan the thinker
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, Feb 19, 2016 7:09 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
JS,
Lee is 100% correct under current law LIBERTY could act like an electronic
sponge all it wanted. I agree with you that we were analysing the information
for intelligence that they didn't know about.
73
DR
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:17 PM, schalestock@xxxxxxxx <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
DR
In my opinion, IF the Liberty was transmitting tactical combat intel to the
Egyptians in real time, you might make the case for it being a belligerent. But
I don't believe that was the case. I suspect most of it was being recorded for
future analysis by the CIA. At any rate, Collecting ELINT in international
waters in no way justifies the Israeli massacre of the Liberty and her sailors.
73
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:57:25 -0500
Of course any nation, any ship, or aircraft has a natural ability to monitor
radio communication or any type of signal intelligence.
The problem is that in giving out military information to either side of two
warring nations, the nation becomes an agent for the belligerent nation, and
thus a belligerent herself having made an Act of War.
73
DR
On Feb 16, 2016 11:16 AM, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
pixiehat
I suspect the ad was by one or more crew members and it is understandable how
they
and others condemn both the USA and Israel but consider there was no proper
trial only
a whitewash. If there had been a proper trial then Israel would have the
opportunity to give
their reasons as a matter of self protection before a crucial battle. Being in
international
waters does not give a warship the right to fling shells or a spy ship to
monitor and give
out military information to either side of two warring nations. If Israel could
prove that the
Liberty was in fact passing military info to the other side consider how this
would effect us
domestically and internationally? Can you or anyone else give any logical
reason why
Israel would do what it did? Don't blame me, I had nothing to do with it.
Stan the neutral man
-----Original Message-----
From: pixiehat <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dmarc-noreply <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; sparkscoffee
<sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Feb 15, 2016 7:40 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
You have been told countless times why you were criticized. All of the reasons
are still valid.
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 02/15/2016 12:59 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Everyone
This item was in the middle of a page in the Miami Herald yesterday, Sunday,
Feb. 14, the same day that
my "Build Ships In U.S." letter was printed. I checked out the Web Site and
there is a string of items all
condemning the U.S. for not prosecuting Israel for their deadly attack. None of
us including me had anything
to do with it but because I expressed my own humble opinion on why, I too was
attacked as if I was
responsible. Go figure? Incidently, as patriotic Americans I have seen no
comments on building, flagging,
manning and home porting Cruise Ships in America while the industry is booming?
Stan the humble man
____________________________________________________________
Citi® Double Cash Card
Earn Cash Back Twice on Purchases Earn 1% When You Buy, 1% As You Pay
https://ad.atdmt.com/c/go;p=11042209007766;a=11042209015528;ev.a=1;idfa=;idfa_lat=;aaid=;aaid_lat=;cache=
