Off your meds again stan? It was the attack on the Liberty and the subsequent
murders and the machine gunning of the liferafts. Those were the war crimes.
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 02/21/2016 10:14 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
JS
It is not up to our Generals to tell Israel not to attack the Golan Heights and
its not up
to Israel Generals to tell us not to attack Viet Nam. What is the point of
being neutral?
Do you think our attack on Viet Nam is a war crime?
Stan the military man
-----Original Message-----
From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Feb 21, 2016 6:17 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
And by the way Stan,
As you probably don't know, there is no statue of limitations on a war crime.
Just ask the 90 year old Nazi camp guards that were hunted down, prosecuted and
imprisoned.
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <djringjr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:13:40 -0500
If lost terribly. If they were afraid USA was going to betrayalong time ally,
they were absolutely wrong, and if they thought that they could use the
telephone.
If they were afraid we would discover their plans to attack Golan Heights, they
should have changed plans.
It is.much more likely that we caught Israel committing a War Crime, and they
wanted to eliminate all witnesses.
David
On Feb 20, 2016 11:02 AM, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JS & DR
Do you consider that a proper reply to my question of what did Israel gain and
what did it risk
losing? Think, think, think.
Stan the thinker
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, Feb 19, 2016 7:09 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
JS,
Lee is 100% correct under current law LIBERTY could act like an electronic
sponge all it wanted. I agree with you that we were analysing the information
for intelligence that they didn't know about.
73
DR
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:17 PM, schalestock@xxxxxxxx <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
DR
In my opinion, IF the Liberty was transmitting tactical combat intel to the
Egyptians in real time, you might make the case for it being a belligerent. But
I don't believe that was the case. I suspect most of it was being recorded for
future analysis by the CIA. At any rate, Collecting ELINT in international
waters in no way justifies the Israeli massacre of the Liberty and her sailors.
73
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:57:25 -0500
Of course any nation, any ship, or aircraft has a natural ability to monitor
radio communication or any type of signal intelligence.
The problem is that in giving out military information to either side of two
warring nations, the nation becomes an agent for the belligerent nation, and
thus a belligerent herself having made an Act of War.
73
DR
On Feb 16, 2016 11:16 AM, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
pixiehat
I suspect the ad was by one or more crew members and it is understandable how
they
and others condemn both the USA and Israel but consider there was no proper
trial only
a whitewash. If there had been a proper trial then Israel would have the
opportunity to give
their reasons as a matter of self protection before a crucial battle. Being in
international
waters does not give a warship the right to fling shells or a spy ship to
monitor and give
out military information to either side of two warring nations. If Israel could
prove that the
Liberty was in fact passing military info to the other side consider how this
would effect us
domestically and internationally? Can you or anyone else give any logical
reason why
Israel would do what it did? Don't blame me, I had nothing to do with it.
Stan the neutral man
-----Original Message-----
From: pixiehat <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dmarc-noreply <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; sparkscoffee
<sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Feb 15, 2016 7:40 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The SS Liberty is not forgotten
You have been told countless times why you were criticized. All of the reasons
are still valid.
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 02/15/2016 12:59 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] The SS Liberty is not forgotten
Everyone
This item was in the middle of a page in the Miami Herald yesterday, Sunday,
Feb. 14, the same day that
my "Build Ships In U.S." letter was printed. I checked out the Web Site and
there is a string of items all
condemning the U.S. for not prosecuting Israel for their deadly attack. None of
us including me had anything
to do with it but because I expressed my own humble opinion on why, I too was
attacked as if I was
responsible. Go figure? Incidently, as patriotic Americans I have seen no
comments on building, flagging,
manning and home porting Cruise Ships in America while the industry is booming?
Stan the humble man
____________________________________________________________
Citi® Double Cash Card
Earn Cash Back Twice on Purchases Earn 1% When You Buy, 1% As You Pay
https://ad.atdmt.com/c/go;p=11042209007766;a=11042209015528;ev.a=1;idfa=;idfa_lat=;aaid=;aaid_lat=;cache=
