[sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers

  • From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:08:07 GMT

Yeah Stanley, "go figure" why the Marine Corps desginates it's snipers as Scout 
Snipers. Must be a typo. Why don't you write the Commandant and correct him.  
Just tell him "Stanley Says." JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:21:55 -0400


JS and all those to whom it may concernI am doing my best to stop JS's bad 
habit of posting figments of his imagination as facts. He said it wasit was 
well documented in a court martial which is available on the pissing incident. 
When I asked for details instead of answering he told lazy me to find out for 
myself without a clue on how to get the facts. Another brother tipped me off 
that simply Googling Urinating on a dead enemy soldier would get me the story 
which I did. It was me who posted the newspaper stories that they were a sniper 
squad, had been in a fire fight with others and almost a dozen enemies were 
killed and they were ordered to drag some of them where they did the pissing on 
three dead ones after looking around to see no one was watching and taped it. 
Later it was put on the internet and the stuff hit the fan. They were court 
martialed and the punishment was a $500 fine and a one grade demotion in rank. 
Two said they would do it again, one after being severely injured died at home, 
one named Chamberlain said he was writing a book on the incident (something 
infamy?). Later JS said it was a recon squad, they got seperated and were mad 
that one of their squad was killed and had his penis stuffed in his mouth none 
of which was in the several reports I read. If JS had been smart he would have 
posted the details as lazy I did. I don't have the court records, only several 
newspaper reports. Since JS said the court martial is well documented and 
available so it is time TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!. Ball is in your side of the 
court. Also note below he now says Marine sniper teams are designated "Scout 
Sniper", go figure? Comrade Stanley      In a message dated 9/22/2014 12:41:34 
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes: David, For what its 
worth, my unit's official designation was "Force Reconnaissance". Not that it 
would make any difference to numb nuts Stanley.  Marine sniper teams are 
designated "Scout Sniper". JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <djringjr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:02:58 -0400

 
It's like putz kop and dick head, same meaning different words.
RECON Squad is one of the correct military terms for Advance Teams.
Scout Team is rarely used in the military, isn't that true, JS and Lee?
73
DR
On Sep 21, 2014 5:49 PM, "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are correct Stan, but you seem to keep trying to make it an issue.

On 9/21/2014 2:26 PM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC) 
wrote:DRAgain, where did you see recon squad other then JS posting? Scout 
Squad/Recon Squad is a non-issue. Stanley In a message dated 9/19/2014 11:49:36 
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, djringjr@xxxxxxxxx writes:AGAIN Comrade.  A Scout 
Squad is another name for a Recon Squad.
Recon is short for reconoiter, to go ahead of others, to scout out unknown 
territory and report back to the others what they have discovered (INTEL or 
intellligence).
Scout Squad, recon squad, advance squad, same thing.
Tonto often scouted for Lone Ranger.
Don't you know to use http://google.com ?
DR
On Sep 19, 2014 11:31 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DRNone of the stories I read used the term 'recon squad' only Scout Squad? Can 
you show me a storywhich used the term 'recon squad'? Stanley In a message 
dated 9/19/2014 11:11:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:Scout 
squad is a  recon squad, comrade.
DR
On Sep 19, 2014 11:07 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" 
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JS House Warrior and Champion Ducker Below is what you posted, none of which 
was reported in the several news items I read. You still haven't revealed your 
non-publicized source and why is it so different from my publicized source? PUT 
UP OR SHUT UP. Stanley  Stanley, "You didn't see..."   seems to be the 
operative phrase for most of what you write. Those Marines were a recon team 
that got separated in a firefight. 
When they regrouped, they found one of their men dead and mutilated  (penis cut 
off and stuffed in his mouth.)   This is the nature of the enemy they were 
fighting. But as we used to say, pay back is a bitch.  Pissing on an enemy 
corpse seems pretty tame when compared to torture and mutilation their comrade 
faced.  You babble on about moral equivalency but you don't have a clue - as 
usual. JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender Scroll down and read 
what you posted, In a message dated 9/19/2014 6:12:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight 
Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes:Scout team IS a recon team you moron. If you 
don't know that, why don't you just shut up. "...indicates that thisindividual 
had raped a woman?"   Your words. You know Stanley, what I think is that you 
sit around with all these other retired  New York Jews and shout at each other. 
Since you are probably the loudest, you must think that validates your point of 
view.  You don't even seem to realize how ridiculous you sound on this net. JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:57:47 -0400

John Schalestock, House WarriorYou have a bad habit which I am trying to fix, 
of posting your fantasies as facts. Exactly where did you get the fact that 
they were a recon team and weredid I say they had raped some Muslin Chick while 
they were running for their life? The utter absurdity of your post should make 
you gag. The informationI posted as read from the news item was they were a 
scout squad, had been in a fire fight and apparently took no loses but they 
succeeded in killing almost a dozen enemies and was ordered to drag the bodies 
to where they videod  the pissing incident after looking around to see if 
anyone was watchingbut it was later put on the internet. Don't give me your 
usual ducking BS that I am lazy and I should look up what you posted. In the 
future to avoid being embarrassed make sure you can prove what you posted and 
not get some one else to prove it. Think, think, think. Comrade B, House Jew, 
Zionist, Socialist   In a message dated 9/16/2014 4:52:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight 
Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes:Stanley, Allow me to sink to your level and 
say you are one stupid boob.  Guilty of rape? Are you out of your fucking mind. 
This was a recon team. The holy grail of all their missions is NOT to be 
noticed. When that happens, you are running for your life and shooting over 
your shoulder. And you propose they had time to stop and rape some chick 
passing down the trail?  The utter absurdity of that makes me gag.  You give 
"low information voters" a bad name. JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:01:43 -0400

 
John SchalestockThink, think, think. Cutting a penis off and stuffing into 
someones mouth normally indicates that thisindividual had raped a woman? Does 
your source mentions this possibility? Rape is universal including in our own 
military. Googling "Urinating on dead soldiers' pulls up a number of stories 
including the video whichincludes a wheelbarrow laying on its side which might 
indicate the dead might not even been soldiers but farmers? I looked at most of 
the posts but saw nothing about the penis in the mouth but one Marine did say 
the enemy had mutulated one of his comrades without mentioning what it was. 
There is a possibility theMarines had simply come across the dead on the ground 
and decided on the spur of the moment to pea on them and video it without 
knowing anything about them? It is an important story and got a lot of 
attention world wide much of it extremely critical including by high commanding 
officers. Think, think, think. Would you care to comment further or do you give 
up? Stanley (scroll down to see what I am replying to)          In a message 
dated 9/16/2014 8:15:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx 
writes:"Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:54:45 -0400

 
LeeYou are hurting my feelings, guess I can't please every one. By the way I 
didn't see anything about whatthese 3 dead soldiers did other then being the 
enemy, did you? Do you think the brave act of pissing ontheir dead soldiers is 
going to frighten the live ones? Would you like to fight them when word gets 
around? How do you think their civilian population will react especially when 
we are trying to win them over to our side? Think they are going to love us? In 
fact how do you think the citizens in America feel about it? Maybe we should 
take a poll? What ignorance are you talking about? Do you approve the act? 
Think, think, think. House Jew, Zionist, Socialist    In a message dated 
9/15/2014 6:30:16 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:It's 
often difficult to ignore your reactions Stan, when they are so many times 
influenced by your ignorance.  What those young Marines did was
clearly against both military policy and regulations.  The Corps had to, once 
the act was made public, take action.  You will note that the punishments
dealt out were not the most severe that could have been.  That should have told 
you something about how the command felt about it. As for world
opinion, would you have expected anything less?  Your reaction deserved the 
criticism that it got.  Although those of us that were critical refrained from
the name calling that you so often resort to.  So often, you post your opinions 
as facts.

Lee


On 9/15/2014 11:22 AM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC) 
wrote:J.J. Miller and everyoneI was amazed, Google "Urinating on corpse", 
IGNORE MY REACTIONS and see how the world,especially the report by the New York 
Times and our military reacted, especially you ass holes schmucks who 
criticized my reaction. A little scrolling is necessary. It was a major story 
at the time. Stanley  In a message dated 9/13/2014 11:15:30 A.M. Eastern 
Daylight Time, seaspark@xxxxxxx writes:You can get a full description by 
looking up, "Urinating on corpse".

J J Miller





____________________________________________________________
The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
FixYourBloodSugar.com
____________________________________________________________
The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar &#40;Don&#39;t Eat This!&#41;
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/542162e0112d662df0739st03vuc

Other related posts: