The usage is not the issue. Semantics is. News articles are seldom written by "experts". Either term, as written by a news writer, would have been the same thing. It is, as has been pointed out, a non issue. To argue this point further is pointless.
Lee On 9/21/2014 6:02 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:
It's like putz kop and dick head, same meaning different words. RECON Squad is one of the correct military terms for Advance Teams. Scout Team is rarely used in the military, isn't that true, JS and Lee? 73 DROn Sep 21, 2014 5:49 PM, "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:You are correct Stan, but you seem to keep trying to make it an issue. On 9/21/2014 2:26 PM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC) wrote:DR Again, where did you see recon squad other then JS posting? Scout Squad/Recon Squad is a non-issue. Stanley In a message dated 9/19/2014 11:49:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, djringjr@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:djringjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: AGAIN Comrade. A Scout Squad is another name for a Recon Squad. Recon is short for reconoiter, to go ahead of others, to scout out unknown territory and report back to the others what they have discovered (INTEL or intellligence). Scout Squad, recon squad, advance squad, same thing. Tonto often scouted for Lone Ranger. Don't you know to use http://google.com <http://google.com/> ? DR On Sep 19, 2014 11:31 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: DR None of the stories I read used the term 'recon squad' only Scout Squad? Can you show me a story which used the term 'recon squad'? Stanley In a message dated 9/19/2014 11:11:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, n1ea@xxxxxxxx <mailto:n1ea@xxxxxxxx> writes: Scout squad is a recon squad, comrade. DR On Sep 19, 2014 11:07 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: JS House Warrior and Champion Ducker Below is what you posted, none of which was reported in the several news items I read. You still haven't revealed your non-publicized source and why is it so different from my publicized source? PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Stanley Stanley, "You didn't see..." seems to be the operative phrase for most of what you write. Those Marines were a recon team that got separated in a firefight. When they regrouped, they found one of their men dead and mutilated (penis cut off and stuffed in his mouth.) This is the nature of the enemy they were fighting. But as we used to say, pay back is a bitch. Pissing on an enemy corpse seems pretty tame when compared to torture and mutilation their comrade faced. You babble on about moral equivalency but you don't have a clue - as usual. JS ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> (Redacted sender Scroll down and read what you posted, In a message dated 9/19/2014 6:12:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx <mailto:schalestock@xxxxxxxx> writes: Scout team IS a recon team you moron. If you don't know that, why don't you just shut up. "...indicates that this individual had raped a woman?" Your words. You know Stanley, what I think is that you sit around with all these other retired New York Jews and shout at each other. Since you are probably the loudest, you must think that validates your point of view. You don't even seem to realize how ridiculous you sound on this net. JS ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>" for DMARC) To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:57:47 -0400 John Schalestock, House Warrior You have a bad habit which I am trying to fix, of posting your fantasies as facts. Exactly where did you get the fact that they were a recon team and were did I say they had raped some Muslin Chick while they were running for their life? The utter absurdity of your post should make you gag. The information I posted as read from the news item was they were a scout squad, had been in a fire fight and apparently took no loses but they succeeded in killing almost a dozen enemies and was ordered to drag the bodies to where they videod the pissing incident after looking around to see if anyone was watching but it was later put on the internet. Don't give me your usual ducking BS that I am lazy and I should look up what you posted. In the future to avoid being embarrassed make sure you can prove what you posted and not get some one else to prove it. Think, think, think. Comrade B, House Jew, Zionist, Socialist In a message dated 9/16/2014 4:52:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx <mailto:schalestock@xxxxxxxx> writes: Stanley, Allow me to sink to your level and say you are one stupid boob. Guilty of rape? Are you out of your fucking mind. This was a recon team. The holy grail of all their missions is NOT to be noticed. When that happens, you are running for your life and shooting over your shoulder. And you propose they had time to stop and rape some chick passing down the trail? The utter absurdity of that makes me gag. You give "low information voters" a bad name. JS ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>" for DMARC) To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:01:43 -0400 John Schalestock Think, think, think. Cutting a penis off and stuffing into someones mouth normally indicates that this individual had raped a woman? Does your source mentions this possibility? Rape is universal including in our own military. Googling "Urinating on dead soldiers' pulls up a number of stories including the video which includes a wheelbarrow laying on its side which might indicate the dead might not even been soldiers but farmers? I looked at most of the posts but saw nothing about the penis in the mouth but one Marine did say the enemy had mutulated one of his comrades without mentioning what it was. There is a possibility the Marines had simply come across the dead on the ground and decided on the spur of the moment to pea on them and video it without knowing anything about them? It is an important story and got a lot of attention world wide much of it extremely critical including by high commanding officers. Think, think, think. Would you care to comment further or do you give up? Stanley (scroll down to see what I am replying to) In a message dated 9/16/2014 8:15:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx <mailto:schalestock@xxxxxxxx> writes: "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>" for DMARC) To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Story - Pissing on 3 dead enemy soldiers Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:54:45 -0400 Lee You are hurting my feelings, guess I can't please every one. By the way I didn't see anything about what these 3 dead soldiers did other then being the enemy, did you? Do you think the brave act of pissing on their dead soldiers is going to frighten the live ones? Would you like to fight them when word gets around? How do you think their civilian population will react especially when we are trying to win them over to our side? Think they are going to love us? In fact how do you think the citizens in America feel about it? Maybe we should take a poll? What ignorance are you talking about? Do you approve the act? Think, think, think. House Jew, Zionist, Socialist In a message dated 9/15/2014 6:30:16 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: It's often difficult to ignore your reactions Stan, when they are so many times influenced by your ignorance. What those young Marines did was clearly against both military policy and regulations. The Corps had to, once the act was made public, take action. You will note that the punishments dealt out were not the mostsevere that could have been. That should have told yousomething about how the command felt about it. As for world opinion, would you have expected anything less? Your reaction deserved the criticism that it got. Although those of us that were critical refrained from the name calling that you so often resort to. So often, you post your opinions as facts. Lee On 9/15/2014 11:22 AM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx> for DMARC) wrote: J.J. Miller and everyone I was amazed, Google "Urinating on corpse", IGNORE MY REACTIONS and see how the world, especially the report by the New York Times and our military reacted, especially you ass holes schmucks who criticized my reaction. A little scrolling is necessary. It was a major story at the time. Stanley In a message dated 9/13/2014 11:15:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, seaspark@xxxxxxx <mailto:seaspark@xxxxxxx> writes: You can get a full description by looking up, "Urinating on corpse". J J Miller ____________________________________________________________ *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?* Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!) <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/541829962be68299655b2st02vuc>FixYourBloodSugar.com <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/541829962be68299655b2st02vuc>
