[sparkscoffee] Re: Revenge

  • From: Ron George <xgeorge@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:01:15 -0700

RR,

I have news for you, there is a BIG difference between betting $3 and betting $300. I will listen to your advice after you have a couple of years of medium stakes cash games under your belt.

RG

On 2/19/2013 11:26 AM, Ron Ristad wrote:
RG,
It makes no difference if the stakes are $300 or $3 the principles are the 
same. If you are playing with scared money then you shouldn't be playing at all 
because it means that you are playing at a disadvantage. I enjoy winning, but 
not as much as I hate losing, which is why I only play in low stakes games.

I don't know what you mean when you say that implied odds don't figure into 
your play because poker is not a slot machine. Slot machines are for chumps. 
Poker is the only game in a casino that is possible to consistently win at 
because it's the only game where you can put the odds on your side if you 
understand the game. If you don't then you might as well be playing the slot 
machines.

-RR

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron George <xgeorge@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Feb 19, 2013 11:42 AM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Revenge

RR,

I am aware of implied odds but they don't figure prominently in my
decisions.
This is because it has been my experience that poker is NOT a slot
machine due
to dozens of variables.

It's easy to think you have the game figured out but sit down at a $300
max bet
cash game and then tell me how to win.

RG

On 2/18/2013 2:15 PM, Ron Ristad wrote:
RG,
Just one comment. With a hand like you had you need to consider the implied 
odds, which is just not the odds of you hitting a full house but the amount of 
money you could win if you do. In this case most likely anybody who is betting 
or calling has a flush, quite possibly the nut flush, and they would never 
expect you to have a full house, meaning that hitting your full house would 
give you a hand that could break them. So even though your odds of making a 
full house was 22% the potential pay off is much greater. In other words it's 
not a 22% or 1-5 odds that you will make your hand, but betting $60 to win $600 
or more, which changes the odds to 2-1 in your favor.

This why a good poker player never thinks about winning or losing, but only how 
they play the game, because if you play well then no matter how bad your luck 
is, in the long run you will always win money. In this case you will only win 
that hand approximately 1 out of 5 times, but when you do win you more than 
make up for all the times you lost.

-RR


"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take 
care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford




Other related posts: