Venu, 1. On a lighter tone - notice the difference between Muranyi and Muryani. 2. The ibis is not bad even upto 1 GHz. There is good correlation in most of the cases till that frequency. 3. I beleive that there could have been less verbose and more accurate method than 200 lines of VI for each of the pull up, pull down, power clamp, ground clamp and 100 lines for each of dV/dt. I have found that spice models created with voltage control sources, resitors are equally good and more intuitive to understand and work with - rather that the verbose black box ibis model. 4. I will suggest to always try to create your own simpler spice model after "understanding" ibis model. 5. The ebd model is not well supported by some vendors including SigXplorer. 6. Crosstalk is difficult to simulate with ibis / ebd for package crosstalk. 7. I beleive that the major reason that ibis was developed was to protect the IP. A Linux way would have been more desirable rather than Microsof's way. Spice could have done better job to provide models. It would also have provided more intuitive understanding of the models. . 8. This is not to attack Arpad's and Intel's ibis. But to provide an insight - All good SI engineer like to play with the driver and receiver model by creating their own intuitive model to understand drive strength variation, edge rate variation, package variation, package crosstalk, die and package capacitance, etc. 9. Sometimes an optimal drive strength setting is required for a particular driver and receiver. IBIS will provide only extreme settings of drive strength. An intuitive model will provide better understanding of "what if" scenario. VS --- "Ummalaneni, Venu Babu (Venu)" <venubabu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >hich are connected to the respective reference > nodes that the > corresponding IV curves are connected >to. So if > the pullup IV curve is > connected to the pullup reference, it can have its > parallel=20 > >C_comp_pullup, and so on. This feature comes handy > when someone is > interested in power delivery=20 > >simulations. > > >One of the biggest drawback of C_comp for very high > speed simulations > is that it is a single and=20 > >constant number (aside from the 4-way splitting > mentioned above). > I.e., you can't=3D20 describe the >voltage or > frequency dependence. For > this reason, the IBIS model maker has to pick the > best value >for C_comp > that is valid for the frequency of operation and the > signaling levels of > the buffer. >This can be done, but may not be > sufficient in every > situation. > > >Arpad Muranyi > > > Muryani, > > Do you mean to say this option of '4-way splitting > mentioned above' is > available in latest IBIS versions? > > Regards, > Venu Babu. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go > to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the > Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are > viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu