Thank you very much Andy! I find it very useful By the way, your guess is correct. I am new student! I am learning concepts of signal integrity! On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM, A. Ingraham <a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why are there peaks and nulls in spectral density and in insertion/return > > loss measurement graphs? > > I suspect this question is asked by someone new to this, perhaps a new > student. Otherwise you probably would have known the answer. (Sorry > if I am wrong.) > > Signal spectra tend to have peaks and nulls because most signals do > not have random timing, and they have regular patterns, such as a bit > rate, where something about the signal repeats every X ns. Also many > signals have a clock that is encoded within the data; or a way to > extract and replicate the clock. That gives most signals some > frequency components that are either there and stronger than the > energy between those frequencies, or that may be missing ... depending > on how the data is encoded ... and there are many ways to encode data > in an electrical or optical signal. An analysis of any of these ways > of encoding data will show frequencies that are stronger or weaker. A > good text book that covers data encoding will show you that. > > Perhaps the only way for a signal spectrum to be uniform without peaks > and dips, is if the data AND its timing is totally random. We don't > work well with signals that have random timing. We tend to like > things that have a known clock rate. > > The peaks and nulls in insertion/return loss measurements are for a > different reason. Any real wire, trace, transmission line, or > whatever, will have discontinuities where they aren't perfectly > uniform. The discontinuity on the end of the signal path (the > mismatch between the wire and its load) is a big one. These > discontinuities give you small resonances and the variations you see > in the measurements. Those peaks and dips wouldn't be there IF the > line is perfectly uniform and is terminated exactly in its > characteristic impedance; which is an ideal that can never be > achieved, especially when you go looking towards higher frequencies. > > Regards, > Andy > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu