I can't resist asking a "newbie" question about your statement. Why would half of the energy couple to the broken-up plane, when it could couple to a beautiful solid continous conductive surface just to the other side? Won't a field form in the "space" of least impedance? Is it because the frequency is too high? Don't answer if its too lame-brained to bother with, ok? (One of these days I'm gonna "read up" on this stuff... sorry) Jack (aka "the new guy") On 11/14/07, steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Zhuyongfa, yes layer 4 acts as a reflection plane to layer 3 signals. > Your current stack-up is a nearly symmetric stripline. About half the > energy will be bound between traces on layer 3 and each of the plane > layers 2, and 4. Where single ended or in-phase differential signals > cross moats on layer 4, energy will go into exciting the slots. Signal > rise-time, crosstalk, and EMI will all be affected. To know the exact > extent, you would need to simulate. > > You can fix this by adjusting the stack-up to reduce coupling from layer > 3 signals to layer 4 etch by moving layer 3 closer to layer 2, and > further from layer 4. Do the same thing with layer 8 wrt layers 9 and > 7. If you use 4 / 11 in place of your current 7 / 8 you will remove > almost all of the coupling from layer 3 to layer 4. > > Good luck. > > Steve. > > z46147 wrote: > > Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 > > Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > > Hi all, > > > > A ten layers high speed PCB, the second layer is GND, the third layer is > signal, the fourth is Power layer. > > > > GND plane is a full one, never been splited. Several types of voltage > are on the power layer, so the power layer is isolated by so many moats. > > > > Thickness between the second and third layer is 7 mil, while 8 mil > between the third and fourth layer. > > > > Some high speed signals traces are routed on the third layer, such as > PCI Express and SAS/SATA signals. > > > > If the high speed signal traces go across isolation moat of the fourth > power layer, can it be treated as crossing split reference plane and give > rise to signal integrity problem? > > > > If it will give rise to signal integrity problem, can we use stiching > capacitors across isolation moats of the power layer to deal with this > issue, while changing the > > isolation moats? > > > > Any thought on this issue would be appreciated. > > > > Best regards. > > > > > > Zhuyongfa > > HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. > > > > > > Address: Huawei Industrial Base > > Bantian Longgang > > Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China > > Tel:+86-755-89653025 > > Fax: +86-755-89650731 > > E-mail: zhuyongfa@xxxxxxxxxx > > www.huawei.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from > HUAWEI, which > > is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. > Any use of the > > information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, > total or partial > > disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the > intended > > recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender by > > phone or email immediately and delete it! > > > > > > > > -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- > > -- Type: image/jpeg > > -- File: outlook_huawei_logo_en.jpg > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.net > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Steve Weir > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > 121 North River Drive > Narragansett, RI 02882 > > California office > (408) 884-3985 Business > (707) 780-1951 Fax > > Main office > (401) 284-1827 Business > (401) 284-1840 Fax > > Oregon office > (503) 430-1065 Business > (503) 430-1285 Fax > > http://www.teraspeed.com > This e-mail contains proprietary and confidential intellectual property of > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Teraspeed(R) is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group > LLC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu