[SI-LIST] Re: De-coupling capacitor

  • From: Istvan Novak - Board Design Technology <inovak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ruston_matt@xxxxxxx,Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:07:14 -0500 (EST)

Pradeep,

From your very first posting it was not clear to me: was the board functioning 
first and you got the short later, or could it be that the capacitor was 
shorted 
from the very beginning?  In which case it could be a very simple manufacturing 
problem that somehow escaped inspection.

Regards
Istvan Novak
SUN Microsystems


        Delivered-To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:48:18 -0800 (PST)
        From: Larry Smith <Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx>
        Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: De-coupling capacitor
        To: pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ruston_matt@xxxxxxx
        Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        MIME-Version: 1.0
        Content-MD5: qKnrGmVXv7KOJ+vXWN0pgg==
        Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
        X-archive-position: 5403
        X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
        X-original-sender: Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx
        X-list: si-list
        
        
        Pradeep - I'll agree with Matt, I have not seen ceramic caps rated at
        63 Volts.  There are many tantalum and electrolytic capacitors rated at
        6.3V, but they usually have much more than 0.1 uF.
        
        I was just telling my manager the other day that I have never heard of
        a ceramic cap shorting.  The ceramic dielectric just does not break
        down.  The capacitance value may deteriorate near rated voltage, but
        this is not a hard failure.  Reduce the voltage and the capacitance
        returns.  I don't believe we are anywhere near the ceramic dielectric
        breakdown voltage.  (Is that correct?  Can anybody confirm the actual
        dielectric breakdown voltage of ceramic?) I have seen ceramic capacitors
        fail for mechanical reasons, cracking, mishandling, etc.  But I have
        never heard of a ceramic capacitor failing for any kind of a wear out
        mechanism.  Does anybody have any evidence to the contrary?
        
        On the other hand, 6.3 V tantalum and aluminum electrolytic capacitors
        are notorious for shorting, sometimes in spectacular ways.  This can be
        caused by too much ripple current, over voltage, aging and drying out,
        reverse insertion, etc.  Is it possible that the capacitor in question
        on this thread is one of the latter?
        
        regards,
        Larry Smith
        Sun Microsystems
        
        > Delivered-To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        > From: "ruston, matt" <ruston_matt@xxxxxxx>
        > To: "'pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
        jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx
        > Cc: "<" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: De-coupling capacitor
        > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:18:47 -0500
        > MIME-Version: 1.0
        > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
        > X-archive-position: 5401
        > X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
        > X-original-sender: ruston_matt@xxxxxxx
        > X-list: si-list
        > 
        > 
        > Pradeep:
        > 
        >  Hi. A 63V capacitor does not sound right. It sounds like a 6.3V cap.
        > Ceramic caps usually have 6.3V, 10V, 16V, 25V, 50V, 100V, etc. 
ratings. If
        > it were a 6.3V cap and with the power supply at 5.5V (max), you would 
be at
        > 87% of rated voltage.
        > 
        >  As for the short, I'm no expert, but I can offer a theory.  The caps 
are
        > using thinner and thinner dielectrics nowadays. Any little defect in 
the
        > dielectric can cause plate metal electromigration into the defect 
under
        > large voltage gradients (high voltage across thin dielectrics). If the
        > defect punches through the dielectric, this can cause a 
plate-to-plate 
short
        > (i.e. electrode-to-electrode).
        > 
        > Regards,
        > 
        > Matt
        > 
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Pradeep Amrithraj [mailto:pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
        > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:35 AM
        > To: jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx
        > Cc: <
        > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: De-coupling capacitor
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > ** Proprietary **
        > 
        > Hi,
        >    i desoldered the capacitor and tested it. it was a dead short.The 
Vcc =
        > (5V) is a regulated one. Iam using a DC to DC converter 24 to 5V. so 
i 
=
        > think there is no chance of getting a higher voltage than 5.5V . My =
        > capacitor rating is 0.1uF 63V.
        > 
        > Regards
        > 
        > 
        > Pradeep Amirtharaj
        > Software Engineer
        > L&T Emsys Mysore.
        > Ph   : 91 821 402561
        > Fax  : 91 821 403752
        > Ext : 2728
        > Email : pradeepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > >>> John Barnes <jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx> 21/01/2003 10:58:44 AM >>>
        > 
        > Pradeep,
        > Have you *verified* that the capacitor is shorted, by removing it from
        > the board, then measuring the capacitor by itself and the board 
without
        > the capacitor?
        > 
        > Power-to-ground shorts are one of the hardest defects to find, because
        > so many components and so much copper area is involved.  Common 
problems
        > are:
        > *  A solder bridge, sometimes like a spiderweb of solder hiding under
        >    a capacitor or integrated circuit (IC).
        > *  A bent lead on a quad flatpack.
        > *  A long lead on a pin-through-hole component, bent and touching=20
        >    another net.
        > *  A solder ball lodged under an IC.
        > *  A cracked capacitor, whose halves have shifted slightly-- the=20
        >    dielectric layers in your capacitor may be < 0.001 inch (25 
microns)
        >    thick, so just a tiny shift can cause a short.
        > *  A copper sliver, from poor etching of the printed circuit board.
        > *  A power trace run right through a ground via (I made this error
        >    on the first pass of a 15" x 7.9" 6-layer board populated with 950
        >    components).
        > *  A piece of wire laying on the card.
        > 
        > If the problem is on the board, start with a thorough visual 
inspection
        > under a stereo microscope, at 7.5 magnification or so.  You may want 
to
        > "twang" suspicious looking leads with a dowel that you sharpened in a
        > pencil sharpener, to see if they move. =20
        > 
        > If nothing shows up visually, get a sensitive ohmmeter, a heat gun, a
        > can of coolant spray, and a co-worker.  Put the ohmmeter across one of
        > the components that shows up shorted, where you can keep good 
contact.=20
        > Slowly scan the area of the board that has both nets with the heatgun,
        > on both sides of the board, looking for a change in the resistance of
        > the short.  When you are close to the short the resistance will rise 
OR
        > fall, maybe by just a little bit, when it gets hot.  Check these areas
        > under the microscope.  If you still can't see anything wrong, heat the
        > suspicious areas of the board with the heatgun until you see the
        > resistance change, then use the coolant spray to cool off small areas
        > until you see the resistance shift the other way.  It may take you a
        > couple of cycles heating an area with the heatgun, and cooling it with
        > coolant spray, to pinpoint the short.
        > 
        >               John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, ESDC Eng, SM IEEE
        >               dBi Corporation
        >               http://www.dbicorporation.com/=20
        > ------------------------------------------------------------------
        > To unsubscribe from si-list:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
        > 
        > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
        > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list=20
        > 
        > For help:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
        > 
        > List archives are viewable at:    =20
        >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list=20
        > or at our remote archives:
        >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
        > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
        >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu=20
        >  =20
        > 
        > 
        > ------------------------------------------------------------------
        > To unsubscribe from si-list:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
        > 
        > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
        > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
        > 
        > For help:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
        > 
        > List archives are viewable at:     
        >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
        > or at our remote archives:
        >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
        > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
        >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
        >   
        > ------------------------------------------------------------------
        > To unsubscribe from si-list:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
        > 
        > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
        > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
        > 
        > For help:
        > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
        > 
        > List archives are viewable at:     
        >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
        > or at our remote archives:
        >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
        > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
        >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
        >   
        > 
        
        ------------------------------------------------------------------
        To unsubscribe from si-list:
        si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
        
        or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
        //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
        
        For help:
        si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
        
        List archives are viewable at:     
                        //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
        or at our remote archives:
                        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
        Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                        http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
          
        

Istvan Novak            Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Istvan.Novak@xxxxxxx    Workgroup Servers, BDT Group,
                        One Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803  
                        Phone: (781) 442 0340

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: