[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Why vote? (was Why I will never vote to change the White DQ)

  • From: Anne Utter <rautt75@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Joan Fox <campaignersgsd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:27:09 -0400

turn that around - what HARM would it do to include whites ?

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 29, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Joan Fox <campaignersgsd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> If someone could explain to me what good it would do for our current gene 
> pool to include whites I could rationalize all this.
> Joan
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:31 PM, "InquestGSD@xxxxxxx" 
> <InquestGSD@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Meaning no disrespect to anyone, but neither Jim nor Randy were there when  
> the changes happened. All they are sharing is their interpretations, and I  
> applaud them for taking the time.
> 
> If I may, I will suggest that before anyone jumps on either of the side's  
> emotional bandwagons, do your homework, and read the following books:
> 
> -The German Shepherd Dog (Capt v Stephanitz)
> -The German Shepherd Dog, a genetic history of the breed.  (Malcolm  Willis)
> -This is the German Shepherd (Goldbecker/Hart)
> -The German Shepherd Dog (Ernest Hart)
> 
> Why are WGSDs allowed to register??  Why does AKC accept their  
> registration? Because they are German Shepherds.
> 
> I have found no real scientific evidence to justify the supposed fear of  
> poor health on the white GSD's, only a lot of misunderstanding.  Stephanitz  
> shared that faded color was (in his opinion, no science) a sign of poor  
> health, but even he admitted that white was not the same as faded.
> 
> I understand ( I think ) the deal about Obedience Victor. Allow me to  
> present a different point. Remember the first dog you got? You had no idea of 
>  
> rules, standards, politics, etc. You just loved your dog. And it was that dog 
> that imprinted in you the love for the breed. At that point, all things 
> were  secondary, yup, even color. All that matter was that you loved your 
> German  Shepherd.  
> 
> Personally, I feel if an entry is good enough for the money, it should be  
> good enough for the prize. 
> 
> I understand that the wishes of the membership need to be respected. You  
> all know me enough to know that goes without saying. I just wish people would 
> vote with their heads, not their anger.  May it not be a case where we are 
> just voting against an issue because you want to vote against a person.
> 
> JMO
> 
> Ileana
> 
> 
> In a message dated 10/25/2013 5:38:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> rautt75@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> The  whites were once in the Breed Standard and bred and shown by 
> prestigious  breeders of the day.  It isn't like they were never part of the  
> Standard.  The reasons for their DQ was found to be faulty.    You might want 
> to 
> also go back and read the article by Jim Moses.
> Anne,  GA
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> > On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Jason  Lyle <lyloak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > The question should not  be why so many disapprove of whites but why 
> there are those that are vehement  in their breeding against the standard.  
> As a 
> breeder I look at myself as  a guardian of the breed.  There is a standard 
> and a reason for that  standard.  For those looking to have more background 
> I would recommend  reading Randy Darnell's article in the latest  review
> 
> 
> ===========================================================================> 
> POST is Copyrighted 2012.  All material remains the property of the original 
> author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any 
> kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
> Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 
> 
> Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and 
> its administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed 
> in any post.
> 
> ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
> MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
> PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
> FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
> PROSECUTED. 
> 
> For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org 
> SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
> NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
> ===========================================================================> 
> 

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================

Other related posts: