The Standard is there for a reason. We need to abide by the Standard, otherwise, like some suggested, anything goes. We allow one thing, then another, and then there is no GSD. Lee F. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stay out of this Dave, it is too controversial! Oh, what the heck! I am not sure of the figures, and negotiating the AKC web site to find them is too time consuming, but if memory serves me right, and it probably doesn't at my age, let's say there are 50,000 German Shepherds born each year. Most go to pet homes. Most do not conform to the standard well enough to enter the show ring. So, let's say that 10% actually do have some chance of becoming a show dog. Of those 5,000 dogs, only a few become champions, maybe 50 a year. So, of the original 50,000 only 50 become champions (Someone with time on their hands get the real figures). That is .01% of the breed. I suppose that this is the mystique that drives us to breed and to show. I've had lots of dogs in my life time and loved them all. But all did not show and all did not win. I did show to win however. I am competitive. So are you or you would not be on this list and hang out with these crazy people. In order for there to be an award, there has to be the exclusion of those who do not win. They do not win, not because they are not loved or trained or of no value. They do not win because they do not meet the criteria for winning. If there is no criteria, then there is no value to the win. Our grandkids love sports and in the initial stages of T-ball, they do not keep score. Well that is, the parents and coaches do not keep score, or, well they are not suppose to. But the kids keep score. They know who won and who lost. They're not suppose to but they do. So, we keep score. I both respect and envy those breeding programs who consistently produce the best and win. Elitism? You bet! That is the nature of the game. Some win and some lose, and those who win do so at the expense of those who do not. No competition - no value in the win No criteria - no exclusions No exclusions - no standard No standard - no breed. We have the power to change the standard, the criteria, the levels of expectation or the application of the awards. The problem is, the lower the standard, in an effort to be more inclusive, the less value to the exclusive nature of the sport. And that is what attracts us to the competition. So what it boils down to is the politics of the sport. What do we want it to be? The higher the standard the fewer people win, but the better of the breed is overall. The lower the standard, more people can win but less want to because the award is devalued, and the less attractive is the breed. I only wish Washington could understand this! Dave ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in any post. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================