[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Confessions of a dishonest JUDGE...long - Wow!
- From: GrnRam415@xxxxxxx
- To: mlgray@xxxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:53:21 EDT
In a message dated 7/4/2006 9:21:37 AM Pacific Standard Time, mlgray@xxxxxxxx
writes:
If they have the =
best
dog they should be allowed to win without worrying about whether or not =
the
judging looks fixed.=20
Mike Gray
Mike,
If they have the best dog then everything else is moot. If they have the
best dog then there should be no perception that the judging "looks" fixed. I
don't believe anyone is bitching about a better dog winning. It is about dogs
that are sub-standard, owned by such people and shown by certain handlers and
winning that is the problem. It is also about ignorant judges and judges who
ignore faults and put up these sub-standard dogs for whatever personal reason
they have. I agree that a good dog is a good dog and should win. But I also
see glaring faults being put up. Is this where we want the breed to go?
Ignore these problems as long as you get the win?
Laura Thomas
http://www.treasureranchgsds.com/
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================
Other related posts:
