[sac-board] Re: Non-Club Articles in the Newsletter
- From: "Peter Argenziano" <pargenz@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:17:28 -0700
Paul,
What's wrong with spacecraft and mission-related articles? That's astronomy
too.
By the way, that's a good resource you cited (Science@NASA)... but those
articles are already on the internet too. ;-)
My opinion (I know, no one asked for my opinion) is that the editor gets to
choose which articles appear in the newsletter.
The use of Space Place articles is granted in advance. The use of
Science@NASA articles is covered by their copyright notice that requests
credit be given and that they be notified of reprinting.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Dickson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "SAC Board" <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 2:58 PM
Subject: [sac-board] Non-Club Articles in the Newsletter
Rick, I'm not a fan of non-club articles in the newsletter. Especially
articles that are already on the Internet. I consider them to be wasted
space.
But if we're going to use such articles, please use astronomy related
articles rather than spacecraft related. Instead of "NASA Space Place",
how about "Science@NASA" (http://science.nasa.gov/Astronomy.htm, E-mail
subscription: http://science.nasa.gov/news/subscribe.asp). The articles
are far more astronomically related than the ones that have been in the
newsletter.
-Paul
Other related posts:
