[sac-board] Re: Newsletter
- From: Steve D. <fester00@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SAC Board <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:30:45 -0700
If we do 1 and 2, we may as well eliminate the "NL Only" membership fee and
category. How many of these do we have? How much, if any, revenue would we
lose?
I'm against 3 because some of my GCSPNR volunteers do not have email, and are
not online at all and therefore would be out of luck vis-a-vis the NL.
Steve Dodder
Chairman, SAC Novice Group
Coordinator, Grand Canyon Star Party, North Rim
Director, Stone Haven Observatory
fester00@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.stonehavenobservatory.com
> From: rharshaw2@xxxxxxx
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Newsletter
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:05:17 -0700
>
> Board,
>
>
> I'd like your okay for a couple of ideas.
>
>
>
>
>
> (1) Make the newsletter available n/c to all science teachers in the
> State. (Walt Thomas is looking into whether or not there is such a email
> distribution list and whether or not the state education department would
> let us use it.)
>
>
>
> (2) I'd like to put the CURRENT version of the newsletter on the web page
> for viewing by the public the month it is released. That is, put March's NL
> on the web page this month, not in 3 or 6 months.
>
>
>
> (3) I'd like to discontinue all printed copies of the NL. With the March
> issue, I'd like to mail the few we do and include a cover letter stating
> that this is the last hard copy issue they will receive, and that if they
> want to continue to receive issues, they need to supply us with an email
> address.
>
>
>
>
>
> Can you please chime in on these points with your thoughts ASAP? I'd like
> permission to do this starting March.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Harshaw
>
> Cave Creek, Arizona
>
> Brilliant Sky Observatory
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
