Just reading through the notice again I can see it was stillborn. Should
have read it properly in the first place. It said born an angel.
Everyone just disreguard my query as I should have looked more carefully at
the notice. Had stillborn ones before.
Margaret.
_____
From: ryerson_index-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ryerson_index-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shari-Lei McLean
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2017 1:22 PM
To: ryerson_index@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ryerson_index] Re: The use of brackets in names
Does it specify the baby was born sleeping? If so, that would make the child
stillborn and the date of birth is also the death date.
I work with families who lose their children in a volunteer position so I
know how that part works.
If it doesn't state the child was born sleeping, there's every chance the
child could have lived at lease a day, so without a death date, you'd have
to index under funeral.
Shari
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Margaret Boots <mboots157@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John, I have a notice in the RB for a baby. It has a birth and also a
funeral date. Do I use the birth or funeral in the drop down box. It is a
funeral notice. This is a first for me of this sort of notice.
Margaret.
-----Original Message-----
From: ryerson_index-bounce@ <mailto:ryerson_index-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
freelists.org
[mailto:ryerson_index-bounce@ ;<mailto:ryerson_index-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
freelists.org] On Behalf Of John Graham
Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2017 6:15 PM
To: ryerson_index@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ryerson_index] The use of brackets in names
We have a standard that says a given name, which is not the actual
name of the deceased, goes in brackets.
That leads to entries like "SMITH, (Mrs John)" and "JONES, (Sister
Paul)". Nicknames are a logical extension of this standard.
Lately, I've corrected a number of cases where the entry has been
something like "BROWN, (Mr W)". This is wrong on two counts: firstly,
"W" is almost certainly the initial of his given name, so it should
not be in brackets. Secondly, we don't usually index titles, so "Mr"
shouldn't be there. The correct entry is just "BROWN, W".
There is only one circumstance where "Mr" is valid - when we have an
un-named male, he can be indexed as either "BLACK, (un-named male)",
or "BLACK, (Mr)" if we wish to indicate an adult male. Either is accepted.
John
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7996 / Virus Database: 4749/13738 - Release Date: 01/09/17
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature>
Version: 2016.0.7996 / Virus Database: 4749/13744 - Release Date: 01/10/17
