[rollei_list] Re: why I'm not digital -( just for interest)
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:00:11 -0400
Not jumping down your throat, Bob, but at a loss to understand your
point. Screen resolution is about the lowest of the low... what is it
that we are supposed to be judging?
Eric Goldstein
--
On 4/11/06, Bob McClelland <rdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Probably OFF-TOPIC, if so, I apologise. Like I say 'just for interest':
> (esp for any analog diehards who have never seen such an example).
>
> Look at www.marscovista.com/norman/ to see what your average digital camera
> produces, on 'auto'. When you're looking, just remember that this is only
> 6.1 megapixels and we're only at the beginning of all this. . .
>
> Hey - before you jump down my throat, just keep in mind that I started doing
> my own silver prints 40+ years ago, and that I'm on the Rollei list! :-)
>
> Bob McClelland
> Cornwall (U.K.)
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
