[rollei_list] Re: T shutter jam, cont'd

  • From: Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 07:41:35 -0400

Now I'm confused.  If I use photoshop,
I'll have to scan my negatives.  If I can
find a scanner, can you tell me how to
use it?


Peter K. wrote:



Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:40:35 -0700
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: T shutter jam, cont'd
From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
Wow! I guess things are not always obvious to everyone. Let us know how this works out. Are you using PhotoShop? I can help you with come details on 
cropping etc if you need.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 


A revelation!  You guys rock.
Gene Johnson wrote:
Gotta agree with Jerry. Almost seems too simple, but even though most of 
my prints are 13~16x20, and most of them are cropped to a 3:2 aspect
ratio,and I mostly use 400 film; the 120 square has been plenty. Enjoy the 
simplicity and freedom to chop away.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Peter,
Ideal? Yes indeed! I used the square format in wedding photos to pay for 6 
and 1/2 years

of college to pay for a bachelors degree an two masters degrees.

Jerry Lehrer


Peter K. wrote:

Sanders,
Don't you get it?! That is why wedding photographers for many years used 
square Sanders, they can crop it vertical or horizontal as needed. Or
leave it square if desired. It was an ideal format.

Peter K





--
Peter K
ӿլ

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2009