[rollei_list] Re: T shutter jam, cont'd

  • From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:40:35 -0700

Wow! I guess things are not always obvious to everyone. Let us know how this
works out. Are you using PhotoShop? I can help you with come details on
cropping etc if you need.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A revelation!  You guys rock.
> Gene Johnson wrote:
>
> Gotta agree with Jerry. Almost seems too simple, but even though most of
> my prints are 13~16x20, and most of them are cropped to a 3:2 aspect
> ratio,and I mostly use 400 film; the 120 square has been plenty. Enjoy the
> simplicity and freedom to chop away.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 28, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Peter,
>
>
> Ideal? Yes indeed! I used the square format in wedding photos to pay for 6
> and 1/2 years
>
> of college to pay for a bachelors degree an two masters degrees.
>
> Jerry Lehrer
>
>
> Peter K. wrote:
>
> Sanders,
>
>
> Don't you get it?! That is why wedding photographers for many years used
> square Sanders, they can crop it vertical or horizontal as needed. Or
> leave it square if desired. It was an ideal format.
>
> Peter K
>
>


-- 
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2009