[rollei_list] Re: T shutter jam, cont'd

  • From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:25:16 -0700

LOL. Very good.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Gene Johnson <genej2ster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Photoshop? What's that?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 10:40 AM, "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wow! I guess things are not always obvious to everyone. Let us know how
> this works out. Are you using PhotoShop? I can help you with come details on
> cropping etc if you need.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Sanders McNew < <sanders@xxxxxxxxx>
> sanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> A revelation!  You guys rock.
>> Gene Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Gotta agree with Jerry. Almost seems too simple, but even though most of
>> my prints are 13~16x20, and most of them are cropped to a 3:2 aspect
>> ratio,and I mostly use 400 film; the 120 square has been plenty. Enjoy
>> the simplicity and freedom to chop away.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Peter,
>>
>>
>> Ideal? Yes indeed! I used the square format in wedding photos to pay for
>> 6 and 1/2 years
>>
>> of college to pay for a bachelors degree an two masters degrees.
>>
>> Jerry Lehrer
>>
>>
>> Peter K. wrote:
>>
>> Sanders,
>>
>>
>> Don't you get it?! That is why wedding photographers for many years used
>> square Sanders, they can crop it vertical or horizontal as needed. Or
>> leave it square if desired. It was an ideal format.
>>
>> Peter K
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Peter K
> Ó¿Õ¬
>
>


-- 
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2009