[rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin and Panoramas
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:26:08 -0700
Aaaron,
Not really. My 828 negatives are on a thinner film stock. 828 film
has paper backing, like 120. It is wound on metal spools like
miniature 620 film. Other than those things, it is identical to 35mm:-)
Jerry
Aaron Reece wrote:
> But isn't 828 basically unperforated 135? -Aaron On Jun 2, 2006, at
> 12:08 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>
>> 828 film is not available, so I won't bother with
>>
>> it.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.0.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/354 - Release Date:
> 06/01/2006
>
Other related posts:
