[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C and two developers
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:24:24 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Burck" <chris.burck@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:41 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C and two
developers
Richard,
Yes, I understood from the earlier messages that the RS is a
two part
developer. However, since Kodak describes it as "to make 1
gallon" (for
the small size), I took that to mean that the dilution is
the dilution is
the dilution, as it were. In other words, if the bottle
indicates a
dilution of 1:4 (or multiple dilution options), then that's
your working
solution.
That detail about replenishing with half-strength solution
sounds awful
strange, though I admit that's not the only thing I find
strange about
T-Max. Kodak's Publication J-86 (which, oddly enough,
doesn't specify a
recommended dilution for the RS, though it does for the
standard T-Max)
makes no reference to such a practice. Where did you hear
this?
I thought I saw it in one of the Kodak publications. I
hope I have not confounded it with something else after all
this time.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
