[rollei_list] Re: Rollei Users Book
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 09:12:53 -0400
Elias -
Do you or anyone on the list know about the technology used by Lulu
and Blurb to print? It seems to be the consensus that Blurb seems to
handle fine images better, and I wonder (if it is true!) why that
might be...
Eric Goldstein
--
On 5/9/08, ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Digital output has its limitations, especially since not all the images
> could be output, adjusted for the output device and then output again (test
> strip, working print, etc.). Some images, either through luck or experience,
> seem perfect for the process. Just think what a radical idea it is to
> publish something so quickly, and without the constraints of traditional
> publishing over-head costs. What would Gutenberg, Faust and Schoefer think!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
